Hippocration General Hospital

In recent years, great emphasis has been placed on the role of arterial stiffness in the development of cardiovascular diseases. Indeed, the assessment of arterial stiffness is increasingly used in the clinical assessment of patients. Although several papers have previously addressed the methodological issues concerning the various indices of arterial stiffness currently available, and their clinical applications, clinicians and researchers still report difficulties in selecting the most appropriate methodology for their specific use. This paper summarizes the proceedings of several meetings of the European Network for Non-invasive Investigation of Large Arteries and is aimed at providing an updated and practical overview of the most relevant methodological aspects and clinical applications in this area.

DOCUMENT REVIEWERS: Luis Alcocer (Mexico), Christina Antza (Greece), Mustafa Arici (Turkey), Eduardo Barbosa (Brazil), Adel Berbari (Lebanon), Luís Bronze (Portugal), John Chalmers (Australia), Tine De Backer (Belgium), Alejandro de la Sierra (Spain), Kyriakos Dimitriadis (Greece), Dorota Drozdz (Poland), Béatrice Duly-Bouhanick (France), Brent M. Egan (USA), Serap Erdine (Turkey), Claudio Ferri (Italy), Slavomira Filipova (Slovak Republic), Anthony Heagerty (UK), Michael Hecht Olsen (Denmark), Dagmara Hering (Poland), Sang Hyun Ihm (South Korea), Uday Jadhav (India), Manolis Kallistratos (Greece), Kazuomi Kario (Japan), Vasilios Kotsis (Greece), Adi Leiba (Israel), Patricio López-Jaramillo (Colombia), Hans-Peter Marti (Norway), Terry McCormack (UK), Paolo Mulatero (Italy), Dike B. Ojji (Nigeria), Sungha Park (South Korea), Priit Pauklin (Estonia), Sabine Perl (Austria), Arman Postadzhian (Bulgaria), Aleksander Prejbisz (Poland), Venkata Ram (India), Ramiro Sanchez (Argentina), Markus Schlaich (Australia), Alta Schutte (Australia), Cristina Sierra (Spain), Sekib Sokolovic (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Jonas Spaak (Sweden), Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios (Greece), Bruno Trimarco (Italy), Thomas Unger (The Netherlands), Bert-Jan van den Born (The Netherlands), Anna Vachulova (Slovak Republic), Agostino Virdis (Italy), Jiguang Wang (China), Ulrich Wenzel (Germany), Paul Whelton (USA), Jiri Widimsky (Czech Republic), Jacek Wolf (Poland), Grégoire Wuerzner (Switzerland), Eugene Yang (USA), Yuqing Zhang (China).

BACKGROUND: Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) remain important causes of morbidity and mortality. The consensus definitions of the Infectious Diseases Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the Mycoses Study Group have been of immense value to researchers who conduct clinical trials of antifungals, assess diagnostic tests, and undertake epidemiologic studies. However, their utility has not extended beyond patients with cancer or recipients of stem cell or solid organ transplants. With newer diagnostic techniques available, it was clear that an update of these definitions was essential. METHODS: To achieve this, 10 working groups looked closely at imaging, laboratory diagnosis, and special populations at risk of IFD. A final version of the manuscript was agreed upon after the groups' findings were presented at a scientific symposium and after a 3-month period for public comment. There were several rounds of discussion before a final version of the manuscript was approved. RESULTS: There is no change in the classifications of "proven," "probable," and "possible" IFD, although the definition of "probable" has been expanded and the scope of the category "possible" has been diminished. The category of proven IFD can apply to any patient, regardless of whether the patient is immunocompromised. The probable and possible categories are proposed for immunocompromised patients only, except for endemic mycoses. CONCLUSIONS: These updated definitions of IFDs should prove applicable in clinical, diagnostic, and epidemiologic research of a broader range of patients at high-risk.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical and immunologic manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) in a large cohort of patients and to define patterns of disease expression. METHODS: The clinical and serologic features of APS (Sapporo preliminary criteria) in 1,000 patients from 13 European countries were analyzed using a computerized database. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 820 female patients (82.0%) and 180 male patients (18.0%) with a mean +/- SD age of 42 +/- 14 years at study entry. "Primary" APS was present in 53.1% of the patients; APS was associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in 36.2%, with lupus-like syndrome in 5.0%, and with other diseases in 5.9%. A variety of thrombotic manifestations affecting the majority of organs were recorded. A catastrophic APS occurred in 0.8% of the patients. Patients with APS associated with SLE had more episodes of arthritis and livedo reticularis, and more frequently exhibited thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. Female patients had a higher frequency of arthritis, livedo reticularis, and migraine. Male patients had a higher frequency of myocardial infarction, epilepsy, and arterial thrombosis in the lower legs and feet. In 28 patients (2.8%), disease onset occurred before age 15; these patients had more episodes of chorea and jugular vein thrombosis than the remaining patients. In 127 patients (12.7%), disease onset occurred after age 50; most of these patients were men. These patients had a higher frequency of stroke and angina pectoris, but a lower frequency of livedo reticularis, than the remaining patients. CONCLUSION: APS may affect any organ of the body and display a broad spectrum of manifestations. An association with SLE, the patient's sex, and the patient's age at disease onset can modify the disease expression and define specific subsets of APS.

Abbreviations ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme; BP: blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESC: European Society of Cardiology; ESH: European Society of Hypertension; ET: endothelin; IMT: carotid intima-media thickness; JNC: Joint National Committee; LVH: left ventricular hypertrophy; LVM: left ventricular mass; PDE-5: phosphodiesterase-5; PPAR-γ: peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-γ; PWV: pulse wave velocity; SBP: systolic blood pressure; WHO: World Health Organization. Introduction In the 2 years since the publication of the 2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [1], research on hypertension has actively been pursued and the results of new important studies (including several large randomized trials of antihypertensive therapy) have been published. Some of these studies have reinforced the evidence on which the recommendations of the 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines were based. However, other studies have widened the information available in 2007, modifying some of the previous concepts, and suggesting that new evidence-based recommendations could be appropriate. The aim of this document of the ESH is to address a number of studies on hypertension published in the last 2 years in order to assess their contribution to our expanding knowledge of hypertension. Furthermore, some critical appraisal of the current recommendations of the ESH/ESC, as well as of other guidelines, might be a useful step toward the preparation of a third version of the European guidelines in the future. The most important conclusions are summarized in boxes. The points that will be discussed are reported in Box 1.Box. 1Assessment of subclinical organ damage for stratification of total cardiovascular risk The 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines recommend total cardiovascular risk be evaluated in each patient to decide about important aspects of treatment: the blood pressure (BP) threshold at which to commence drug administration, the target BP to be reached by treatment, the use of two-drug combinations as the initial treatment step, and the possible addition to the antihypertensive treatment regimen of lipid-lowering and antiplatelet agents [1]. Among the criteria to assess total cardiovascular risk, the European guidelines consider subclinical organ damage to be a very important component, because asymptomatic alterations of the cardiovascular system and the kidney are crucial intermediate stages in the disease continuum that links risk factors such as hypertension to cardiovascular events and death. On the basis of a number of criteria (prognostic importance, prevalence in the population, availability and cost of the assessment procedures, etc.), the 2007 European guidelines considered detection of organ damage as important for the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of hypertensive patients. They further subdivided the different types of organ damage into (1) those that can be identified by relatively simple and cheap procedures [electrocardiogram, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and measurement of urinary protein excretion in order to detect microalbuminuria or proteinuria], which were thus regarded as suitable for routine search in the whole hypertensive population, and (2) those that require more complex procedures or instrumentations (echocardiogram, carotid ultrasonography, pulse wave velocity), which were for this reason only recommended for a more in-depth characterization of the hypertensive patient. Since then, other studies have added useful information on the importance of detecting subclinical organ damage in the hypertensive population, strengthening the recommendation to use the most easily available and the least costly procedures in the routine examination of individuals with hypertension. Heart A few recent papers have revived interest in the of the to the risk of cardiovascular In a a new of left ventricular the of left ventricular that is on and has been reported to be to cardiovascular The for and Furthermore, in the the have reported that in hypertensive with left individuals at risk of cardiovascular cardiovascular and for a very recent on the in as with left ventricular and of cardiovascular events hypertension is by risk for each evidence is available on the of as by of interest because of to more and and A has information more and hypertensive with left ventricular left ventricular left ventricular in of the left ventricular and and the risk of as large as that of with left ventricular in on population, the left ventricular and for and only in the risk with has been by other In a on a of hypertensive for with a of and cardiovascular events and with for cardiovascular risk factors Furthermore, a of hypertensive in the that cardiovascular events about more in with a or more with those with a this in the population, with a to in cardiovascular and were for a large number of and BP A in the risk more risk the The of carotid and with cardiovascular discussed in the 2007 guidelines, has been further by which have that carotid cardiovascular events of BP and and this for the at the carotid and for the at the of the carotid that by the at the and by the carotid prognostic in addition to that of prognostic of carotid has been reported in a of of the of cardiovascular which for about years has on the prognostic of arterial In the population, pulse wave with a in the risk of a cardiovascular Furthermore, of for cardiovascular events has been in for years of and wave such as BP and have been as of cardiovascular events in recent studies In in of these studies of and hypertensive only and cardiovascular for cardiovascular risk and carotid However, be that in most available the of BP pressure which the BP be considered in the of hypertensive in of further new the evidence on the prognostic of that available at the of the 2007 guidelines [1]. In the of in the with a of cardiovascular events and in the and with a in the of and cardiovascular events for cardiovascular risk and of in a of the to the of and to the different and more of the to the which only of The by the to be of and cardiovascular events in the large number of 2 in the were for the urinary protein excretion of the risk of cardiovascular events the in the risk of cardiovascular and events and evidence is available to the large of in of the prognostic of the in urinary protein as microalbuminuria In the and the microalbuminuria as important of cardiovascular the and in with microalbuminuria with those In the the of microalbuminuria with a In the a of to the with a and in the risk of cardiovascular cardiovascular and this the the to microalbuminuria The of urinary protein excretion and were of each other and the of microalbuminuria and about in for cardiovascular for cardiovascular and for of organ damage The 2007 European guidelines a number of of organ damage for which evidence of prognostic use in the could be because of of such as the cost and availability of the the and in the procedures, and in several the of of the and on the evidence available in the last 2 addition to the of organ damage in the 2007 guidelines can be the availability of more and the cost of their use about by In this the use of in a very recent in a of hypertensive cardiovascular disease has the information that are more and subclinical and in the of other of organ damage evidence these to a of importance because of the of the more and more in diagnostic procedures, disease is to more in prognostic and studies in hypertension. The prognostic of alterations in has been by studies However, the of this measurement of this A new for the of for evaluation to be on a of a that has been actively in the In a of individuals cardiovascular disease with hypertension and with the of the of cardiovascular this of cardiovascular risk factors in the large of of the Health added very to the prognostic of risk factors On the have reported that in a of hypertensive for about of the the with a in cardiovascular events for cardiovascular risk However, the of have reported that in the of hypertensive of cardiovascular events because in different have a different prognostic the prognostic of in hypertension to be further be that the addition of new of organ damage to the assessment of total cardiovascular risk only the of their prognostic importance, has to the to the of cardiovascular is by to be and are available that in some new risk factors of prognostic added to the the by which cardiovascular risk can be thus only the diagnostic procedures more and is by the recent results of the which that of to in the and by which total cardiovascular risk organ damage as a of cardiovascular risk subclinical organ damage the of cardiovascular risk, the the patient into the that risk of at least cardiovascular events in years patients. The 2007 European guidelines hypertensive with subclinical organ damage those with a total cardiovascular is further by more recent evidence on the contribution of subclinical and damage to the total cardiovascular to subclinical of the by some of the studies that in hypertensive of the is with of cardiovascular events to or in years in years has been reported for for with in the in the hypertensive of the with a of cardiovascular events of with the in evidence for In the of the Health the of cardiovascular events the carotid or more and and in those with in the In the hypertensive of the the of and cardiovascular events in years carotid in the third and or at least been In with in the or the cardiovascular events in In hypertensive the of cardiovascular events or more and in those with in the and Furthermore, asymptomatic disease as by a has been to be in with of cardiovascular events in years and recent evidence that in hypertensive subclinical organ damage is with a risk of cardiovascular events of or has been reported some years that by a serum more is with a of cardiovascular events or more In the recent of hypertensive a with cardiovascular events of about in with Furthermore, in the hypertensive by the of disease in years in the of microalbuminuria and of only in in the the of cardiovascular events in only in those individuals in microalbuminuria in the with in the of these hypertension. The 2007 European guidelines with subclinical organ damage as at risk BP is in the evidence that this is the is In the of the information available on the prognostic of in the and hypertensive Furthermore, in the population, the of with cardiovascular events for cardiovascular risk BP In the microalbuminuria with only a cardiovascular in that a risk to the and in the individuals of the a microalbuminuria the with a rate of cardiovascular events of only in years with a rate in individuals with microalbuminuria the of of subclinical organ damage The 2007 European guidelines have that of organ damage the of cardiovascular that organ damage be to the in the in which hypertensive in treatment by of or a in cardiovascular those in or to that in and in other studies a in and or cardiovascular with in treatment or in with a of cardiovascular events and to Since 2007, on the in damage and cardiovascular have been by further of the which have that in left left ventricular and in of with cardiovascular rate Furthermore, have been that in in treatment cardiovascular the of in the carotid has for the been in a recent of to a of the of these with the large in to conclusions The of in with cardiovascular has been by some of the In this on a large number of or very cardiovascular risk the with a of angiotensin-converting and the in the on with or the other this by a in cardiovascular events and with in events However, these results the important that in can be a of the more or of treatment because for the results are in most a and few which in a very number of the that for that Furthermore, in the very cardiovascular risk the of the system by the and might have of that and the with a in In of this are some recent of the in with 2 In these of a with and cardiovascular the contribution of to the of on the important prognostic of subclinical organ damage to In hypertensive and the population, the of and a carotid or arterial a by the or microalbuminuria or the total cardiovascular risk, hypertensive into the risk The in or by treatment the on cardiovascular information on are more or by the treatment some recent results evidence that this is the for in urinary protein the for the of subclinical organ damage is of crucial importance in the hypertensive assessment can use of simple and cheap procedures that can routine information and at can on more that can further and In organ damage assessment is useful because of the evidence that in the of of organ damage to the cardiovascular risk be more with to the cardiovascular risk is published subclinical organ damage can total cardiovascular risk to the in with However, organ damage is or or is by risk is with a or in risk in individuals and the 2007 guidelines recommend risk as a for the of treatment in and patients. In this is important to that the of organ damage in that decide to the of several studies that the of cardiovascular events is in in hypertensive for cardiovascular risk factors and is with the that antihypertensive treatment a total risk to a the that in treatment is organ damage is use of organ damage assessment thus to a more about the of treatment and thus Some of the discussed in of subclinical organ damage for stratification of total cardiovascular risk are summarized in Box guidelines on the management of hypertension recommend the of antihypertensive in with a or more a or and to the treatment in order for the to be these They further recommend drug treatment to be a BP that a and and a and in with or a of cardiovascular or at The 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines have these recommendations with information on the evidence are and a critical of this has been by of the in the of further information by recent The of the ESH document is to the and the of evidence on which these recommendations are and thus the and of studies which possible evidence to antihypertensive treatment recommend use of antihypertensive in with hypertension at or cardiovascular risk, that BP is and and treatment has However, be that the evidence in of this recommendation is because trials of on BP could be those hypertension or the recent which in the 2007 guidelines to in with cardiovascular risk, evidence because BP a large of antihypertensive at and a number of evidence of organ damage or a of cardiovascular to the or that the BP threshold for drug treatment is to and recommend antihypertensive at at least or at least in the as However, as in is on hypertensive that with a in the hypertension can be that current guidelines recommendations on BP at which to drug treatment in the are on results other and by the large of antihypertensive in available trials in the at initial blood and at in antihypertensive treatment trials in the is for the guidelines recommendation to drug treatment in the BP have are on the results of the of the which has important as a the the the in and a of cardiovascular events in the randomized to more treatment to the of to other cardiovascular of large and However, in by BP were and the of cardiovascular in the in the of antihypertensive treatment in with or in those in this were stratification on the or of a of hypertension. have been recommendations to antihypertensive treatment at BP in with previous have been on the the that in with a previous or BP by a in the of and cardiovascular events in hypertensive and patients. However, in this hypertension by of or and in a a in with treatment only or more Furthermore, BP in were reported of treatment in of the and be to on of treatment in patients. the of evidence of has been by the results of a more recent large of antihypertensive treatment in with the these results be to a more in a more discussed in the 2007 European guidelines and further in a recent trials are available the information drug treatment be at BP in with disease is in most to the of the to the which were in these were subdivided for their or BP on a of antihypertensive drug administration, and thus the to a BP the results and trials pressure The evidence available on the BP of antihypertensive treatment has been by some of this and is summarized in in the in of trials in hypertensive to in the actively at or this in the or In of the BP with a in and in this for that were and the in a previous were at or cardiovascular risk and with this evidence the recommendation of guidelines to to in the of with or 2 hypertension and or total cardiovascular this recommendation to hypertensive is by in the of in trials the of hypertensive randomized to more treatment a of cardiovascular in the only with results the were to is evidence in of the guidelines recommendation to the target in patients. The of that the guidelines recommendation to BP in with or a of cardiovascular disease is by the recommendation in of treatment to the by some such as and a of cardiovascular for a BP in in hypertensive patients. in the of only in were and were with a in cardiovascular results trials in with a of or disease with the that in some trials in which to with the with of of trials and trials on organ damage on BP and for drug treatment has been of trials and studies on the of treatment on organ damage of prognostic importance, this is of the of cardiovascular events in to the BP by treatment have been in the large of hypertensive of the in the cardiovascular risk for the the and the and in the with of the In the the of cardiovascular events at a of and a of In the hypertensive in the BP a in the of cardiovascular events and with to the in BP these of the of treatment In the the of cardiovascular events as the of in which BP to be were for and The cardiovascular with a for cardiovascular events to as the to about On the in the of BP were initial were for were and at each initial a BP by a cardiovascular However, in in initial in the the and for have been reported for the of in in the with of the of to to cardiovascular and to of as well as in disease to the BP and subclinical organ the have that the of is to the BP by treatment, the for large BP the A published has that of is by as with BP and in hypertensive Furthermore, several studies have evidence that antihypertensive treatment is by a or a in urinary protein be in the or initial BP is The most recent evidence has been by the which has that in most of antihypertensive treatment, further BP by the addition of and the of of the the or the of urinary protein a of initial systolic or diastolic BP to The for a and in the actively as with the at initial or and Furthermore, this of the has the risk of a to as the treatment to of about The has been some a for of on the of some trials as well as of the results of other trials on have the that in at cardiovascular risk, antihypertensive treatment that to or and be by a further in the of that by a has to the as to BP is and in of cardiovascular The is to the a BP which organ is studies in of cardiovascular disease that the BP and cardiovascular rate is to very BP which are only by antihypertensive is possible that in cardiovascular risk of the that blood the BP threshold which organ is However, the of this be different in to the of organ damage and has been by trials to the of more BP for initial and of results the that in the in which BP could have been a initial cardiovascular risk that the BP and the of cardiovascular this is by the evidence of a in of several trials these the of cardiovascular by a of BP that is and and suggesting that this BP the in cardiovascular are is in with the results of studies that the BP and cardiovascular events is cardiovascular events are on a which at BP the 2007 recommendations the evidence is to in hypertensive at and risk, drug be BP to or a suitable with with the to BP this of antihypertensive treatment in hypertension for BP to to 2 or organ damage to is by a recent of trials with antihypertensive agents has that in trials on cardiovascular risk the that the risk by lipid-lowering and antiplatelet can very the a cardiovascular events in by a initial risk On the in trials hypertensive at initial or risk, the could be to in which that of antihypertensive be threshold and target for drug treatment in the the current availability of well BP to be with in or in cardiovascular or of antihypertensive drug in with BP is by is the for the BP recommended for in large and are more in the subclinical organ and microalbuminuria and to be the to decide the BP for treatment as well as treatment in patients. and at least the of studies such as which the of BP or are be useful to recommend that in be well that are be in with the results of the in which the and of antihypertensive treatment were in in to with on in at recommendations can be to with previous cardiovascular for current evidence is of antihypertensive drug treatment BP is in the and the of at a BP target of has been in those with a BP that the 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines as at cardiovascular risk because of the of risk or subclinical organ has been that this BP subclinical organ damage to a cardiovascular risk, and is this The evidence in of in these is to that reported by the and the studies in which of antihypertensive drug the of hypertension the of the this be pursued with or with addition of antihypertensive agents last recommendations for a number of of patient management randomized trials can only for a few years and of the results to the of is The to into that the of antihypertensive treatment more with because of organ damage has a in with the of large and with a BP to be by the results of the few trials in which were for a number of years of randomized In the and for the of antihypertensive treatment on the of cardiovascular events years of the of the the that antihypertensive treatment in the A which is to as the has been reported for the 2 which reported a on the and of 2 years of with that antihypertensive and in the a of the of a previous blood in The most important points to threshold and target BP for treatment are summarized in and of antihypertensive In their and 2007 [1], the European guidelines the large number of randomized trials of antihypertensive those treatment and those treatment on different They that the of antihypertensive treatment are to of BP and are of the well as and and can BP and and cardiovascular these are suitable for the and of antihypertensive treatment as or in some combinations with each of the of the of antihypertensive and of agents a has been a in the by the of a by in and in the with the as for and the of by their has been by different of on a possible of and as well as on the possible of for and of for disease to possible or of new and is of and and be by of guidelines On the be to of the of The evidence which have been as antihypertensive and in the recommendations discussed in the 2007 European on the of in antihypertensive have been added since In a of of randomized trials of a has been reported the rate by and cardiovascular the the the the of and to be by On the a recent of randomized trials only a of in with other a as other agents on events and and a other in with a recent Furthermore, the recent publication of a of the and in has the of cardiovascular to be in on the or the with a in the is with of large of on different antihypertensive treatment for in randomized that the of cardiovascular on treatment on other antihypertensive agents has been of the possible of a BP by treatment in those trials in which to have a on of on in the of the that the very to the because of the in and On the to be to other antihypertensive agents in their to A recent more hypertensive different has a of in However, studies for the be with with other antihypertensive agents because of a wave to to be on antihypertensive management be because the and is to at hypertension and antihypertensive treatment are most is that as well as have and in such as those with the or The importance of this have been by the results of most studies and trials have been that by of in or in to of or with a blood a recent of the has that new of at the of this in at are by a number of in which of at at the of the However, the for Furthermore, is the as with some studies that with have a of cardiovascular the and several years the conclusions in other studies is with other agents in trials subclinical organ damage as have been to be and in left ventricular carotid and and this be to in cardiovascular in the be that are a and that such as and to some of the for other and pulse pressure at the BP rate and because of the with has on BP In the on total and and at has been to and to have the as and have been in trials in in and of the of and in treatment by and in the the on or with in of microalbuminuria and to in hypertensive and has been to and left ventricular pressure in the hypertensive the cardiovascular by and in with is in hypertension to be in a A for in antihypertensive such as that to these in the is of The evidence that a BP by can types of cardiovascular events is be that most of the the of which has been the basis for on have to the of these drug the of and is to and has been have been in for their to organ and have been to or Furthermore, large studies that have the of of antihypertensive agents on to have to with the least or those by the least on treatment a recent has reported for for In the results of the be discussed in the drug combinations have as to are the of and The that be to other antihypertensive agents in has been on the basis of some and A to the that be to in has been On the has been that be to in these concepts, as well as their have been by the results of the very large cardiovascular treatment with or has to be to as as the of a are A of on and more recent trials the that and have the on The by the relatively BP by treatment is more to because in and for could a is to decide the has to be with the of the several years or with the of the on to The of with a of cardiovascular events in because prevalence of in to that in or because of a of and have some information on the of and on the of new in patients. the that has been to of new different and in and only and were in and in with to the However, most were other antihypertensive agents that have the of the these the that a have been the of a of events by the the On the some recent that these agents have some in is this can be to a or to a BP in the patients. is are in as is in several studies and large The recent by that trials in which a BP antihypertensive and the

An RNA virus, designated hepatitis G virus (HGV), was identified from the plasma of a patient with chronic hepatitis. Extension from an immunoreactive complementary DNA clone yielded the entire genome (9392 nucleotides) encoding a polyprotein of 2873 amino acids. The virus is closely related to GB virus C (GBV-C) and distantly related to hepatitis C virus, GBV-A, and GBV-B. HGV was associated with acute and chronic hepatitis. Persistent viremia was detected for up to 9 years in patients with hepatitis. The virus is transfusion-transmissible. It has a global distribution and is present within the volunteer blood donor population in the United States.

AIMS: To calculate robust quantitative estimates on the predictive value of central pressures and derived central haemodynamic indices for cardiovascular (CV) outcomes and all-cause mortality by meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. METHODS AND RESULTS: We meta-analysed 11 longitudinal studies that had employed measures of central haemodynamics and had followed 5648 subjects for a mean follow-up of 45 months. The age- and risk-factor-adjusted pooled relative risk (RR) of total CV events was 1.088 (95% CI 1.040-1.139) for a 10 mmHg increase of central systolic pressure, 1.137 (95% CI 1.063-1.215) for a 10 mmHg increase of central pulse pressure (PP), and 1.318 (95% CI 1.093-1.588) for a 10% absolute increase of central augmentation index (AIx). Furthermore, we found that a 10% increase of central AIx was associated with a RR of 1.384 (95% CI 1.192-1.606) for all-cause mortality. When compared with brachial PP, central PP was associated with marginally but not significantly higher RR of clinical events (P = 0.057). CONCLUSION: Central haemodynamic indexes are independent predictors of future CV events and all-cause mortality. Augmentation index predicts clinical events independently of peripheral pressures, while central PP has a marginally but not significantly (P = 0.057) better predictive ability when compared with peripheral PP.

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Principles The 2013 European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology (ESH/ESC) guidelines continue to adhere to some fundamental principles that inspired the 2003 and 2007 guidelines, namely to base recommendations on properly conducted studies identified from an extensive review of the literature; to consider, as the highest priority, data from randomized, controlled trials and their meta-analyses, but not to disregard the results of observational and other studies of appropriate scientific calibre; and to grade the level of scientific evidence and the strength of recommendations in order to more effectively alert physicians on recommendations that are based on the opinions of the experts rather than on evidence (Tables 1 and 2). When appropriately recognized, this can avoid guidelines being perceived as prescriptive and favour the performance of studies wherein opinion prevails and evidence is lacking.TABLE 1: Classes of recommendationsTABLE 2: Levels of evidenceThis shortened version of the ESH/ESC guidelines is for the practicing physician who often requires simplified information. However, whenever the physicians would like to know the source of the data upon which the recommendations are based, they are encouraged to consult the extensive version of the ESH/ESC guidelines wherein adequate references are given. These guidelines, however, do not override the individual responsibility of healthcare professionals to make appropriate decisions in the circumstances of the individual patient. 1.2 New aspects Because of new evidence on several diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of hypertension, the present guidelines differ from the 2007 ones in several points: Re-emphasis on integration of blood pressure (BP), cardiovascular risk factors, asymptomatic organ damage and clinical complications for total cardiovascular risk assessment. Update of the prognostic significance of out-of-office BP (both ambulatory and home BP), white-coat hypertension and masked hypertension. Initiation of antihypertensive drug treatment only in patients with SBP or DBP values at least 140 or 90 mmHg, independent of level of total cardiovascular risk. Unified target SBP (<140 mmHg) in both higher and lower cardiovascular risk patients. Revised recommendations on treatment of hypertension in young people and in the elderly. Liberal approach to initial monotherapy, without any all-ranking purpose scheme. Revised therapeutic algorithm for achieving target BP. Revised attention to resistant hypertension. 2. DEFINITIONS AND CLASSIFICATIONS The continuous relationship between BP and cardiovascular and renal events make the distinction between normotension and hypertension difficult. In practice, however, cut-off BP values are universally used to facilitate the decision about treatment (Table 3).TABLE 3: Definitions and classification of office blood pressure levels (mmHg)In order to help prognosis, total cardiovascular risk should be stratified in different categories (low, moderate, high and very high risk referred to the 10-year risk of cardiovascular mortality), based on BP category, cardiovascular risk factors, asymptomatic organ damage and presence of diabetes, and symptomatic cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease (CKD), as summarized in Fig. 1.FIGURE 1: Stratification of total cardiovascular risk in categories of low, moderate, high and very high risk according to SBP and DBP and presence of risk factors (RFs), asymptomatic organ damage (OD), diabetes, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage or symptomatic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Individuals with a high normal office but a raised out-of-office BP (masked hypertension) have a cardiovascular risk in the hypertension range. Individuals with a high office BP but normal out-of-office BP (white-coat hypertension), particularly if there is no diabetes, OD, CVD or CKD, have lower risk than sustained hypertension for the same office BP. BP, blood pressure; CV, cardiovascular; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HT, hypertension; SBP, systolic blood pressure.3. DIAGNOSTIC EVALUATION The initial evaluation of a patient with hypertension should confirm the diagnosis of hypertension; detect causes of secondary hypertension; and assess cardiovascular risk, organ damage and concomitant clinical conditions. This calls for BP measurement, medical history including family history, physical examination, laboratory investigation and further diagnostic tests. Some of the investigations are needed in all patients; others only in specific patient groups. 3.1 Blood pressure measurement 3.1.1 Office and out-of-office blood pressure Although conventional office BP measurement currently remains the ‘gold standard’ for screening, diagnosis and management of hypertension, it is generally accepted that out-of-office BP provides important adjunct information. At present, BP can no longer be estimated using a mercury manometer in many – although not all – European countries. Auscultatory or oscillometric semiautomatic sphygmomanometers are used instead, but these devices should be validated according to standardized protocols and their accuracy checked periodically. Table 4 gives instructions for correct office BP measurements, and Table 5 provides clinical indications for out-of-office BP measurement, namely measurements at home or over the 24 h.TABLE 4: Office blood pressure measurementTABLE 5: Clinical indications for out-of-office blood pressure measurement for diagnostic purposesOffice BP is usually higher than ambulatory and home BP and the difference increases as office BP increases. Cut-off values for the definition of hypertension by home and ambulatory BP are reported in Table 6.TABLE 6: Definitions of hypertension by office and out-of-office blood pressure levels3.1.2 White-coat and masked hypertension The term ‘white-coat’ or ‘isolated office’ hypertension refers to a condition in which BP is elevated in the office at repeated visits and normal out of the office either on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring or on home blood pressure monitoring. Conversely, BP may be normal in the office and abnormally high out of the medical environment, which is termed ‘masked’ or ‘isolated ambulatory’ hypertension. Cut-off values to be used are those in Table 6. 3.1.3 Central blood pressure Owing to the variable superposition of incoming and reflected pressure waves along the arterial tree, aortic BP (central BP) may be different from brachial BP. Central BP can be estimated indirectly by various methods. The current guidelines consider that, despite the growing interest in these methods, more investigation is needed before recommending the routine measurement of central BP for clinical use. 3.2 Medical history The information to be obtained at the time of the first diagnosis of hypertension is indicated in Table 7.TABLE 7: Personal and family medical history3.3 Physical examination Physical examination aims to establish or verify the diagnosis of hypertension, establish current BP, screen for secondary causes of hypertension and refine global cardiovascular risk. Procedures for BP measurement are indicated in Tables 4 and 5. Other information to be obtained by physical examination is in Table 8.TABLE 8: Physical examination for secondary hypertension, organ damage and obesity3.4 Laboratory investigations Laboratory investigations are directed at providing evidence for additional risk factors, searching for secondary hypertension and looking for organ damage. Investigations should proceed from the most simple to the more complicated ones, as summarized in Table 9.TABLE 9: Laboratory investigations3.5 Searching for asymptomatic organ damage Owing to the importance of asymptomatic organ damage as an intermediate stage in the continuum of cardiovascular disease, and as a determinant of overall cardiovascular disease, signs of organ involvement should be sought carefully by appropriate techniques as indicated below.Figure3.6 Searching for secondary forms of hypertension A specific, potentially reversible cause of BP elevation can be identified in a relatively small number of adult patients with hypertension. However if basal work-up leads to the suspicion of a secondary form of hypertension, the patient should be referred to a specialized centre where specific diagnostic procedures may be performed. 4. TREATMENT APPROACH 4.1 Recommendations of previous guidelines revised The 2007 ESH/ESC Guidelines, like many other scientific guidelines, recommended the use of antihypertensive drugs in patients with Grade 1 hypertension even in the absence of other risk factors or organ damage after nonpharmacological treatment had proved unsuccessful. This recommendation also specifically included the elderly hypertensive patient. The 2007 Guidelines also suggested drug treatment of patients with diabetes, previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) or CKD even when their BP was in the high normal range (130–139/85–89 mmHg). Furthermore, a lower BP target was recommended for these high or very high risk patients (<130/80 mmHg) than in patients at low–moderate risk (<140/90 mmHg). These recommendations were reappraised in a 2009 ESH Task Force document on the basis of an extensive critical review of the evidence. The following now summarizes the conclusions for the current guidelines: attention should be directed to the Class of recommendation and the Level of evidence, in order to distinguish what is considered compelling and what simply prudent. Figure 2 also summarizes recommendations and suggestions for treatment initiation and BP targets in the context of total risk stratification of hypertensive individuals.FIGURE 2: Initiation of lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drug treatment. Targets of treatment are also indicated. Colours are as in Fig. 1. See 4.3 and 6.5 for evidence that, in patients with diabetes, the optimal DBP target is between 80 and 85 mmHg. In the high normal blood pressure (BP) range, drug treatment should be considered in the presence of a raised out-of-office BP (masked hypertension). See 4.2 and 6.3 for lack of evidence in favour of drug treatment in young individuals with isolated systolic hypertension. CKD, chronic kidney disease; CVD, cardiovascular disease; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HT, hypertension; OD, organ damage; RF, risk factor; SBP, systolic blood pressure.4.2 When to initiate antihypertensive drug treatmentFigure4.3 Blood pressure treatment targetsFigure5. TREATMENT STRATEGIES 5.1 Lifestyle changes Appropriate lifestyle changes are the cornerstone for the prevention of hypertension. They are also important for its treatment, although they should never delay the initiation of drug therapy in patients at high level of risk. In addition to the BP-lowering effect, lifestyle changes contribute to the control of other cardiovascular risk factors and clinical conditions. The lifestyle measures that have been shown to be capable of reducing BP and therefore recommended are as follows: salt restriction to 5–6 g/day; moderation of alcohol consumption to no more than 20–30 g of ethanol per day in men and 10–20 g/day in women; high consumption of vegetables and fruits and low-fat dairy products; reduction of weight to a BMI of 25 kg/m2 and waist circumference to less than 102 cm in men and less than 88 cm in women; at least 30 min of moderate dynamic exercise on 5 to 7 days per week. 5.2 Pharmacological therapy 5.2.1 Choice of antihypertensive drugs The current guidelines reconfirm that all major classes of antihypertensive agents are suitable for the initiation and maintenance of antihypertensive treatment either in monotherapy or in some combinations, and that no all-purpose ranking of drugs for general antihypertensive usage is evidence based. All classes have their advantages but also contraindications, and may be preferentially used or avoided in specific conditions. Contraindications and preferred indications are listed in Tables 10 and 11.TABLE 10: Compelling and possible contraindications to the use of antihypertensive drugsTABLE 11: Drugs to be preferred in specific conditions5.2.2 Monotherapy and combination therapy The current guidelines share the 2007 Guidelines’ opinion that monotherapy can reduce BP to target only in a limited number of patients and that most patients require the combination of at least two drugs, and they reconfirm that initiation with a drug combination can be considered in patients at high cardiovascular risk or with markedly high BP. The algorithm of Fig. 3, however, is a modification of the 2007 one, to emphasize that adding drugs to drugs should be done with attention to results and any compound overtly ineffective or minimally effective should be replaced, rather than retained in an automatic step-up multiple-drug approach. Combinations to be preferred or avoided are illustrated in Fig. 4.FIGURE 3: Monotherapy vs. drug combination strategies to achieve target blood pressure (BP). CV, cardiovascular.FIGURE 4: Possible combinations of classes of antihypertensive drugs. Green continuous lines: preferred combinations; green dashed line: useful combination (with some limitations); black dashed lines: possible but less well tested combinations; red continuous line: not recommended combination. Although verapamil and diltiazem are sometimes used with a β-blocker to improve ventricular rate control in permanent atrial fibrillation, only dihydropyridine calcium antagonists should normally be combined with β-blockers. ACE, angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker. *Thiazide diuretics also include thiazide-like compounds (chlorthalidone) and indapamide.Strengths of recommendations about choice of drugs and combinations of antihypertensive agents are given in the summary table below.Figure6. TREATMENT STRATEGIES IN SPECIAL CONDITIONS Summary recommendations for antihypertensive treatment strategies in various conditions are listed below. 6.1 White-coat and masked hypertensionFigure6.2 ElderlyFigure6.3 Young adultsFigure6.4 WomenFigure6.5 Diabetes mellitusFigure6.6 Metabolic syndromeFigure6.7 Diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathyFigure6.8 Cerebrovascular diseaseFigure6.9 Heart diseaseFigure6.10 Atherosclerosis, arteriosclerosis and peripheral artery diseaseFigure6.11 Resistant hypertensionFigure7. TREATMENT OF ASSOCIATED RISK FACTORSFigure8. FOLLOW-UP 8.1 Follow-up visits After initiation of antihypertensive drug therapy, it is important to see the patient at 2-week to 4-week intervals to evaluate the effects on BP and to assess possible side-effects. Some medications will have an effect within days or weeks but a continued delayed response may occur during the first 2 months. Once the target is reached, a visit interval of a few months is reasonable. 8.2 Elevated blood pressure at control visits Patients and physicians have a tendency to interpret an uncontrolled BP at a given visit as due to occasional factors and thus to downplay its clinical significance. Due attention should be given to poor adherence or irregular consumption of drugs (sometimes because of adverse effects), to the white-coat effect and to substances or drugs opposing the antihypertensive effect of treatment. 8.3 Can antihypertensive medication be stopped? In some patients, in whom treatment is accompanied by an effective BP control for an extended period, it may be possible to reduce the number and dosage of drugs. This may be particularly the case if BP control is accompanied by healthy lifestyle changes. Reduction of medications should be made gradually and the patient should frequently be checked because of the risk of reappearance of hypertension. 9. IMPROVEMENT OF BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL IN HYPERTENSION Despite overwhelming evidence that hypertension is a major cardiovascular risk factor and that BP-lowering substantially reduce the risk, there is evidence that all over the world a noticeable proportion of hypertensive individuals are unaware of this condition or, if aware, do not undergo treatment; target BP values are seldom achieved; failure to achieve BP control is associated with persistence of an elevated cardiovascular risk; and the rate of awareness of hypertension and BP control is improving slowly or not at all. As a consequence, high BP remains a leading cause of death and cardiovascular morbidity in Europe, as elsewhere in the world. Overall, three main causes of the low rate of BP control in real life have been identified: physician inertia; patient low adherence to treatment; and deficiencies of healthcare systems in their approach to chronic diseases. Methods to improve adherence to physicians’ recommendations are listed in Table 12.TABLE 12: Methods to improve adherence to physicians’ recommendations

Uterine malformations consist of a group of miscellaneous congenital anomalies of the female genital system. Their mean prevalence in the general population and in the population of fertile women is approximately 4.3%, in infertile patients approximately 3.5% and in patients with recurrent pregnancy losses approximately 13%. Septate uterus is the commonest uterine anomaly with a mean incidence of approximately 35% followed by bicornuate uterus (approximately 25%) and arcuate uterus (approximately 20%). It seems that malformed uterus and especially septate uterus is not an infertility factor in itself. However, it may have a part in the delayed natural conception of women with mainly secondary infertility. On the other hand, patients with uterine malformations seem to have an impaired pregnancy outcome even as early as their first pregnancy. Overall term delivery rates in patients with untreated uterine malformations are only approximately 50% and obstetric complications are more frequent. Unicornuate and didelphys uterus have term delivery rates of approximately 45%, and the pregnancy outcome of patients with untreated bicornuate and septate uterus is also poor with term delivery rates of only approximately 40%. Arcuate uterus is associated with a slightly better but still impaired pregnancy outcome with term delivery rates of approximately 65%. Women who have undergone hysteroscopic septum resection and have been reported in the different series comprise a highly selected group of symptomatic patients with term delivery and live birth rates of only approximately 5%. Hysteroscopic treatment seems to restore an almost normal prognosis for the outcome of their pregnancies with term delivery rates of approximately 75% and live birth rates of approximately 85%. It seems, therefore, that hysteroscopic septum resection can be applied as a therapeutic procedure in cases of symptomatic patients but also as a prophylactic procedure in asymptomatic patients in order to improve their chances for a successful delivery.

Many important decisions on hypertension management must currently be taken without the support of evidence&#13;\nfrom large randomized controlled trials. The following issues appear in urgent need to be approached by simply&#13;\ndesigned trials.&#13;\n(1) Should antihypertensive drugs be prescribed to all patients with grade 1 hypertension, even when total&#13;\ncardiovascular risk is relatively low or moderate? Because of the very low rate of cardiovascular events&#13;\nexpected in these patients, a placebo-controlled trial using intermediate endpoints such as signs of organ&#13;\ndamage of recognized prognostic importance would be feasible, ethical, and clinically relevant.&#13;\n(2) Should antihypertensive drugs be prescribed to the elderly with grade 1 hypertension, and should antihypertensive&#13;\ntreatment achieve a goal of below 140/90mmHg also in the elderly? These trials could make use&#13;\nof hard cardiovascular outcomes and could be placebo-controlled.&#13;\n(3) Should antihypertensive drug treatment be started in diabetic patients or in patients with previous cerebrovascular&#13;\nor cardiovascular disease when BP is still in the high normal level, and should BP goal be below 130/&#13;\n80mmHg in these patients? These issues can be approached by placebo-controlled trials because no trial&#13;\nevidence is still available on the benefit of lowering high normal BP or of achieving BP goals below 130/&#13;\n80mmHg.&#13;\n(4) What are the lowest safe BP values to achieve by treatment in different clinical conditions? This issue should&#13;\nbe approached by trials comparing more or less intense BP-lowering treatment strategies in patients with&#13;\ndifferent cardiovascular risk levels.&#13;\n(5) Are lifestyle measures known to reduce BP also capable of reducing morbidity and mortality in hypertension?&#13;\nA controlled randomized trial using intermediate endpoints (organ damage) would be feasible and desirable&#13;\nin patients with high normal BP or grade 1 hypertension.

ABPMambulatory blood pressure monitoringACEangiotensin converting enzymeARBangiotensin receptor blockerA-Vatrio-ventricularBBbeta-blockerBPblood pressureCHDcoronary heart diseaseCKDchronic kidney d...

These practice guidelines on the management of arterial hypertension are a concise summary of the more extensive ones prepared by the Task Force jointly appointed by the European Society of Hypertension and the European Society of Cardiology. These guidelines have been prepared on the basis of the best available evidence on all issues deserving recommendations; their role must be educational and not prescriptive or coercive for the management of individual subjects who may differ widely in their personal, medical and cultural characteristics. The members of the Task Force have participated independently in the preparation of these guidelines, drawing on their academic and clinical experience and by objective examination and interpretation of all available literature. A disclosure of their potential conflict of interest is reported on the websites of the ESH and the ESC.

Information about reprints can be found online at: Reprints: document. Permissions and Rights Question and Answer this process is available in the click Request Permissions in the middle column of the Web page under Services. Further information about Office. Once the online version of the published article for which permission is being requested is located, can be obtained via RightsLink, a service of the Copyright Clearance Center, not the EditorialHypertensionin Requests for permissions to reproduce figures, tables, or portions of articles originally publishedPermissions: by guest on March 4,

CONTEXT: The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a cluster of metabolic abnormalities that increase the risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus and vascular disease. The common characteristics of MetS and hypercortisolemic conditions such as Cushing's syndrome (CS) suggest that the pathogenesis of MetS and central obesity might involve prolonged and excessive exposure to glucocorticoids. The present review summarizes the evidence on the potential role of cortisol in the pathogenesis of MetS and discusses new therapeutic approaches for these patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Using PubMed, we searched for publications during the last 20 yr regarding the possible pathogenetic role of cortisol in the development of MetS. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Emerging data suggest that patients with MetS show hyperactivity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, which leads to a state of "functional hypercortisolism." The cause for this activation of the HPA axis remains uncertain but may be partly associated with chronic stress and/or low birth weight, which are both associated with increased circulating cortisol levels and greater responsiveness of the HPA axis. Increased exposure to cortisol contributes to increased fat accumulation in visceral depots. However, cortisol metabolism is not only centrally regulated. The action of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1 at the tissue level also modulates cortisol metabolism. Increased 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-1 activity in adipose tissue and liver might contribute to the development of several features of the MetS. CONCLUSIONS: MetS shares many characteristics of CS, and cortisol might play a role in the development of MetS at both a central and a peripheral level.

he investigation of various me-chanical forces and the tissue de-formations they induce have beenextensively studied for over three centu-ries. The basic principles concerning therelationship between mechanical stressand strain of various materials were demon-strated by Robert Hooke (1635-1703) andproved to be essential for the improvementof bio-materials and the understanding ofpathophysiological mechanisms in the vas-cular bed. Subsequently, the ground-break-ing studies of Jean Poiseuille (1799-1869)led to the development of mercury mano-meters for blood pressure measurementand resulted in theories describing the flowinside a cylindrical conduit, widely knownas Poiseuille’s law. The present work aims to describeand provide an interpretation of basic me-chanical and haemodynamic phenomenarelated to forces applied to arterial wallsand especially shear stresses.

The diagnosis and treatment of mucormycosis are challenging. The incidence of the disease seems to be increasing. Hematological malignancies are the most common underlying disease in countries with high income and uncontrolled diabetes in developing countries. Clinical approach to diagnosis lacks sensitivity and specificity. Radiologically, multiple (≥10) nodules and pleural effusion are reportedly associated with pulmonary mucormycosis. Another finding on computerized tomography (CT) scan, which seems to indicate the presence of mucormycosis, is the reverse halo sign. Microscopy (direct and on histopathology) and culture are the cornerstones of diagnosis. Molecular assays can be used either for detection or identification of mucormycetes, and they can be recommended as valuable add-on tools that complement conventional diagnostic procedures. Successful management of mucormycosis is based on a multimodal approach, including reversal or discontinuation of underlying predisposing factors, early administration of active antifungal agents at optimal doses, complete removal of all infected tissues, and use of various adjunctive therapies. Our armamentarium of antifungals is slightly enriched by the addition of two newer azoles (posaconazole and isavuconazole) to liposomal amphotericin B, which remains the drug of choice for the initial antifungal treatment, according to the recently published guidelines by ECIL-6, as well as those published by ECMM/ESCMID. Despite the efforts for better understanding of the pathogenesis, early diagnosis and aggressive treatment of mucormycosis, the mortality rate of the disease remains high.

Maintenance of endothelial cell integrity is an important component of human health and disease since the endothelium can perform various functions including regulation of vascular tone, control of hemostasis and thrombosis, cellular adhesion, smooth muscle cell proliferation, and vascular inflammation. Endothelial dysfunction is encompassed by complex pathophysiology that is based on endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling and endothelial activation following stimulation from various inflammatory mediators (molecular patterns, oxidized lipoproteins, cytokines). The downstream signaling via nuclear factor-κB leads to overexpression of adhesion molecules, selectins, and chemokines that facilitate leukocyte adhesion, rolling, and transmigration to the subendothelial space. Moreover, oscillatory shear stress leads to pro-inflammatory endothelial activation with increased monocyte adhesion and endothelial cell apoptosis, an effect that is dependent on multiple pathways and flow-sensitive microRNA regulation. Moreover, the role of neutrophil extracellular traps and NLRP3 inflammasome as inflammatory mechanisms contributing to endothelial dysfunction has recently been unveiled and is under further investigation. Consequently, and following their activation, injured endothelial cells release inflammatory mediators and enter a pro-thrombotic state through activation of coagulation pathways, downregulation of thrombomodulin, and an increase in platelet adhesion and aggregation owing to the action of von-Willebrand factor, ultimately promoting atherosclerosis progression.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic, non communicable, multisystem disease that has reached epidemic proportions. Chronic exposure to hyperglycaemia affects the microvasculature, eventually leading to diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy and neuropathy with high impact on the quality of life and overall life expectancy. Sexual dysfunction is an often-overlooked microvascular complication of T2DM, with a complex pathogenesis originating from endothelial dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to present current definitions, epidemiological data and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy and sexual dysfunction. We also describe the clinical and laboratory evaluation that is mandatory for the diagnosis of these conditions. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed to identify data from clinical studies for the prevalence, risk factors and diagnostic methods of microvascular complications of T2DM. RESULTS: Diabetic nephropathy and retinopathy affect approximately 25% of patients with T2DM; diabetic neuropathy is encountered in almost 50% of the diabetic population, while the prevalence of erectile dysfunction ranges from 35-90% in diabetic men. The duration of T2DM along with glycemic, blood pressure and lipid control are common risk factors for the development of these complications. Criteria for the diagnosis of these conditions are well established, but exclusion of other causes is mandatory. CONCLUSION: Early detection of microvascular complications associated with T2DM is important, as early intervention leads to better outcomes. However, this requires awareness of their definition, prevalence and diagnostic modalities.

BACKGROUND: Atorvastatin is very effective in reducing plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. However, there is no long-term survival study that evaluated this statin. PATIENTS-METHODS: To assess the effect of atorvastatin on morbidity and mortality (total and coronary) of patients with established coronary heart disease (CHD), 1600 consecutive patients were randomised either to atorvastatin or to 'usual' medical care. The dose of atorvastatin was titrated from 10 to 80 mg/day, in order to reach the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) goal of LDL-C <100 mg/dl (2.6 mmol/l). All patients were followed up for a mean period of 3 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoints of the study were defined as death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, revascularisation (coronary morbidity) and stroke. Secondary endpoints were the safety and efficacy of the hypolipidaemic drugs as well as the cost-effectiveness of atorvastatin. RESULTS: The mean dosage of atorvastatin was 24 mg/day. This statin reduced total chlesterol by 36%, LDL-C by 46%, triglycerides by 31%, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) by 44%, while it increased HDL-C by 7%; all these changes were significant. The NCEP LDL-C and non-HDL-C treatment goals were reached by 95% (n = 759) and 97% (n = 776), respectively, of patients on atorvastatin. Only 14% of the 'usual' care patients received any hypolipidaemic drugs throughout the study and 3% of them reached the NCEP LDL-C treatment goal. The cost per quaility-adjusted life-year gained with atorvastatin was estimated at $US 8350. During this study 196 (24.5%) CHD patients on 'usual' care had a CHD recurrent event or died vs. 96 (12%) CHD patients on atorvastatin; risk ratio (RR) 0.49, confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.73, p < 0.0001. In detail, atorvastatin reduced, in comparison to 'usual' care, total mortality (RR 0.57, CI 0.39-0.78, p = 0.0021), coronary mortality (RR 0.53, CI 0.29-0.74, p = 0.0017), coronary morbidity (RR 0.46, CI 0.25-0.71, p < 0.0001), and stroke (RR 0.53, CI 0.30-0.82, p = 0.034). All subgroups of patients (women, those with diabetes mellitus, arterial hypertension, age 60 to 75 years, congestive heart failure, recent unstable angina or prior revascularisation) benefited from treatment with atorvastatin. Withdrawal of patients because of side-effects from the atorvastatin group was low (0.75%) and similar to that of the 'usual' care group (0.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment of CHD patients with atorvastatin to achieve NCEP lipid targets significantly reduces total and coronary mortality, coronary morbidity and stroke, in comparison to patients receiving 'usual' medical care. Treatment with atorvastatin is well tolerated and cost-effective.

Echocardiography plays an important role in the diagnosis and follow-up of aortic diseases. Evaluation of the aorta is a routine part of the standard echocardiographic examination. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) permits adequate assessment of several aortic segments, particularly the aortic root and proximal ascending aorta. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) overcomes the limitations of TTE in thoracic aorta assessment. TTE and TOE should be used in a complementary manner. Echocardiography is useful for assessing aortic size, biophysical properties, and atherosclerotic involvement of the thoracic aorta. Although TOE is the technique of choice in the diagnosis of aortic dissection, TTE may be used as the initial modality in the emergency setting. Intimal flap in proximal ascending aorta, pericardial effusion/tamponade, and left ventricular function can be easily visualized by TTE. However, a negative TTE does not rule out aortic dissection and other imaging techniques must be considered. TOE should define entry tear location, mechanisms and severity of aortic regurgitation, and true lumen compression. In addition, echocardiography is essential in selecting and monitoring surgical and endovascular treatment and in detecting possible complications. Although other imaging techniques such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance have a greater field of view and may yield complementary information, echocardiography is portable, rapid, accurate, and cost-effective in the diagnosis and follow-up of most aortic diseases.