Manchester Royal Infirmary

DOCUMENT REVIEWERS: Luis Alcocer (Mexico), Christina Antza (Greece), Mustafa Arici (Turkey), Eduardo Barbosa (Brazil), Adel Berbari (Lebanon), Luís Bronze (Portugal), John Chalmers (Australia), Tine De Backer (Belgium), Alejandro de la Sierra (Spain), Kyriakos Dimitriadis (Greece), Dorota Drozdz (Poland), Béatrice Duly-Bouhanick (France), Brent M. Egan (USA), Serap Erdine (Turkey), Claudio Ferri (Italy), Slavomira Filipova (Slovak Republic), Anthony Heagerty (UK), Michael Hecht Olsen (Denmark), Dagmara Hering (Poland), Sang Hyun Ihm (South Korea), Uday Jadhav (India), Manolis Kallistratos (Greece), Kazuomi Kario (Japan), Vasilios Kotsis (Greece), Adi Leiba (Israel), Patricio López-Jaramillo (Colombia), Hans-Peter Marti (Norway), Terry McCormack (UK), Paolo Mulatero (Italy), Dike B. Ojji (Nigeria), Sungha Park (South Korea), Priit Pauklin (Estonia), Sabine Perl (Austria), Arman Postadzhian (Bulgaria), Aleksander Prejbisz (Poland), Venkata Ram (India), Ramiro Sanchez (Argentina), Markus Schlaich (Australia), Alta Schutte (Australia), Cristina Sierra (Spain), Sekib Sokolovic (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Jonas Spaak (Sweden), Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios (Greece), Bruno Trimarco (Italy), Thomas Unger (The Netherlands), Bert-Jan van den Born (The Netherlands), Anna Vachulova (Slovak Republic), Agostino Virdis (Italy), Jiguang Wang (China), Ulrich Wenzel (Germany), Paul Whelton (USA), Jiri Widimsky (Czech Republic), Jacek Wolf (Poland), Grégoire Wuerzner (Switzerland), Eugene Yang (USA), Yuqing Zhang (China).

Diabetic neuropathies are the most prevalent chronic complications of diabetes. This heterogeneous group of conditions affects different parts of the nervous system and presents with diverse clinical manifestations. The early recognition and appropriate management of neuropathy in the patient with diabetes is important for a number of reasons: 1. Diabetic neuropathy is a diagnosis of exclusion. Nondiabetic neuropathies may be present in patients with diabetes and may be treatable by specific measures. 2. A number of treatment options exist for symptomatic diabetic neuropathy. 3. Up to 50% of diabetic peripheral neuropathies may be asymptomatic. If not recognized and if preventive foot care is not implemented, patients are at risk for injuries to their insensate feet. 4. Recognition and treatment of autonomic neuropathy may improve symptoms, reduce sequelae, and improve quality of life. Among the various forms of diabetic neuropathy, distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSPN) and diabetic autonomic neuropathies, particularly cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN), are by far the most studied (1–4). There are several atypical forms of diabetic neuropathy as well (1–4). Patients with prediabetes may also develop neuropathies that are similar to diabetic neuropathies (5–10). Table 1 provides a comprehensive classification scheme for the diabetic neuropathies. View this table: Table 1 Classification for diabetic neuropathies Due to a lack of treatments that target the underlying nerve damage, prevention is the key component of diabetes care. Screening for symptoms and signs of diabetic neuropathy is also critical in clinical practice, as it may detect the earliest stages of neuropathy, enabling early intervention. Although screening for rarer atypical forms of diabetic neuropathy may be warranted, DSPN and autonomic neuropathy are the most common forms encountered in practice. The strongest available evidence regarding treatment pertains to these forms. This Position Statement is based on several recent technical reviews, to which the reader is referred for detailed discussion …

Over the last decade, there have been numerous developments and changes in treatment practices for the management of patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). This article is an update of the International Consensus Report published in 2010. A critical review was performed to identify all relevant articles published between 2009 and 2018. An expert panel screened, reviewed, and graded the studies and formulated the updated consensus recommendations based on the new data. The final document provides consensus recommendations on the diagnosis and management of ITP in adults, during pregnancy, and in children, as well as quality-of-life considerations.

The majority of dermal wounds are colonized with aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms that originate predominantly from mucosal surfaces such as those of the oral cavity and gut. The role and significance of microorganisms in wound healing has been debated for many years. While some experts consider the microbial density to be critical in predicting wound healing and infection, others consider the types of microorganisms to be of greater importance. However, these and other factors such as microbial synergy, the host immune response, and the quality of tissue must be considered collectively in assessing the probability of infection. Debate also exists regarding the value of wound sampling, the types of wounds that should be sampled, and the sampling technique required to generate the most meaningful data. In the laboratory, consideration must be given to the relevance of culturing polymicrobial specimens, the value in identifying one or more microorganisms, and the microorganisms that should be assayed for antibiotic susceptibility. Although appropriate systemic antibiotics are essential for the treatment of deteriorating, clinically infected wounds, debate exists regarding the relevance and use of antibiotics (systemic or topical) and antiseptics (topical) in the treatment of nonhealing wounds that have no clinical signs of infection. In providing a detailed analysis of wound microbiology, together with current opinion and controversies regarding wound assessment and treatment, this review has attempted to capture and address microbiological aspects that are critical to the successful management of microorganisms in wounds.

Background The ESPAC-3 trial showed that adjuvant gemcitabine is the standard of care based on similar survival to and less toxicity than adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Other clinical trials have shown better survival and tumour response with gemcitabine and capecitabine than with gemcitabine alone in advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and capecitabine compared with gemcitabine monotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer. Methods We did a phase 3, two-group, open-label, multicentre, randomised clinical trial at 92 hospitals in England, Scotland, Wales, Germany, France, and Sweden. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had undergone complete macroscopic resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (R0 or R1 resection). We randomly assigned patients (1:1) within 12 weeks of surgery to receive six cycles of either 1000 mg/m 2 gemcitabine alone administered once a week for three of every 4 weeks (one cycle) or with 1660 mg/m 2 oral capecitabine administered for 21 days followed by 7 days' rest (one cycle). Randomisation was based on a minimisation routine, and country was used as a stratification factor. The primary endpoint was overall survival, measured as the time from randomisation until death from any cause, and assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Toxicity was analysed in all patients who received trial treatment. This trial was registered with the EudraCT, number 2007-004299-38, and ISRCTN, number ISRCTN96397434. Findings Of 732 patients enrolled, 730 were included in the final analysis. Of these, 366 were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine and 364 to gemcitabine plus capecitabine. The Independent Data and Safety Monitoring Committee requested reporting of the results after there were 458 (95%) of a target of 480 deaths. The median overall survival for patients in the gemcitabine plus capecitabine group was 28·0 months (95% CI 23·5–31·5) compared with 25·5 months (22·7–27·9) in the gemcitabine group (hazard ratio 0·82 [95% CI 0·68–0·98], p=0·032). 608 grade 3–4 adverse events were reported by 226 of 359 patients in the gemcitabine plus capecitabine group compared with 481 grade 3–4 adverse events in 196 of 366 patients in the gemcitabine group. Interpretation The adjuvant combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine should be the new standard of care following resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Funding Cancer Research UK.

The diabetic neuropathies are heterogeneous, affecting different parts of the nervous system that present with diverse clinical manifestations. They may be focal or diffuse. Most common among the neuropathies are chronic sensorimotor distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DPN) and the autonomic neuropathies. DPN is a diagnosis of exclusion. The early recognition and appropriate management of neuropathy in the patient with diabetes is important for a number of reasons. 1 ) Nondiabetic neuropathies may be present in patients with diabetes. 2 ) A number of treatment options exist for symptomatic diabetic neuropathy. 3 ) Up to 50% of DPN may be asymptomatic, and patients are at risk of insensate injury to their feet. As >80% of amputations follow a foot ulcer or injury, early recognition of at-risk individuals, provision of education, and appropriate foot care may result in a reduced incidence of ulceration and consequently amputation. 4 ) Autonomic neuropathy may involve every system in the body. 5 ) Autonomic neuropathy causes substantial morbidity and increased mortality, particularly if cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is present. Treatment should be directed at underlying pathogenesis. Effective symptomatic treatments are available for the manifestations of DPN and autonomic neuropathy. This statement is based on two recent technical reviews (1,2), to which the reader is referred for detailed discussion and relevant references to the literature. An internationally agreed simple definition of DPN for clinical practice is “the presence of symptoms and/or signs of peripheral nerve dysfunction in people with diabetes after the exclusion of other causes” (3). However, the diagnosis cannot be made without a careful clinical examination of the lower limbs, as absence of symptoms should never be assumed to indicate an absence of signs. This definition conveys the important message that not all patients with peripheral nerve dysfunction have a neuropathy caused by diabetes. Confirmation can be established with …

Abbreviations ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme; BP: blood pressure; DBP: diastolic blood pressure; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESC: European Society of Cardiology; ESH: European Society of Hypertension; ET: endothelin; IMT: carotid intima-media thickness; JNC: Joint National Committee; LVH: left ventricular hypertrophy; LVM: left ventricular mass; PDE-5: phosphodiesterase-5; PPAR-γ: peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor-γ; PWV: pulse wave velocity; SBP: systolic blood pressure; WHO: World Health Organization. Introduction In the 2 years since the publication of the 2007 guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) [1], research on hypertension has actively been pursued and the results of new important studies (including several large randomized trials of antihypertensive therapy) have been published. Some of these studies have reinforced the evidence on which the recommendations of the 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines were based. However, other studies have widened the information available in 2007, modifying some of the previous concepts, and suggesting that new evidence-based recommendations could be appropriate. The aim of this document of the ESH is to address a number of studies on hypertension published in the last 2 years in order to assess their contribution to our expanding knowledge of hypertension. Furthermore, some critical appraisal of the current recommendations of the ESH/ESC, as well as of other guidelines, might be a useful step toward the preparation of a third version of the European guidelines in the future. The most important conclusions are summarized in boxes. The points that will be discussed are reported in Box 1.Box. 1Assessment of subclinical organ damage for stratification of total cardiovascular risk The 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines recommend total cardiovascular risk be evaluated in each patient to decide about important aspects of treatment: the blood pressure (BP) threshold at which to commence drug administration, the target BP to be reached by treatment, the use of two-drug combinations as the initial treatment step, and the possible addition to the antihypertensive treatment regimen of lipid-lowering and antiplatelet agents [1]. Among the criteria to assess total cardiovascular risk, the European guidelines consider subclinical organ damage to be a very important component, because asymptomatic alterations of the cardiovascular system and the kidney are crucial intermediate stages in the disease continuum that links risk factors such as hypertension to cardiovascular events and death. On the basis of a number of criteria (prognostic importance, prevalence in the population, availability and cost of the assessment procedures, etc.), the 2007 European guidelines considered detection of organ damage as important for the diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of hypertensive patients. They further subdivided the different types of organ damage into (1) those that can be identified by relatively simple and cheap procedures [electrocardiogram, serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and measurement of urinary protein excretion in order to detect microalbuminuria or proteinuria], which were thus regarded as suitable for routine search in the whole hypertensive population, and (2) those that require more complex procedures or instrumentations (echocardiogram, carotid ultrasonography, pulse wave velocity), which were for this reason only recommended for a more in-depth characterization of the hypertensive patient. Since then, other studies have added useful information on the importance of detecting subclinical organ damage in the hypertensive population, strengthening the recommendation to use the most easily available and the least costly procedures in the routine examination of individuals with hypertension. Heart A few recent papers have revived interest in the of the to the risk of cardiovascular In a a new of left ventricular the of left ventricular that is on and has been reported to be to cardiovascular The for and Furthermore, in the the have reported that in hypertensive with left individuals at risk of cardiovascular cardiovascular and for a very recent on the in as with left ventricular and of cardiovascular events hypertension is by risk for each evidence is available on the of as by of interest because of to more and and A has information more and hypertensive with left ventricular left ventricular left ventricular in of the left ventricular and and the risk of as large as that of with left ventricular in on population, the left ventricular and for and only in the risk with has been by other In a on a of hypertensive for with a of and cardiovascular events and with for cardiovascular risk factors Furthermore, a of hypertensive in the that cardiovascular events about more in with a or more with those with a this in the population, with a to in cardiovascular and were for a large number of and BP A in the risk more risk the The of carotid and with cardiovascular discussed in the 2007 guidelines, has been further by which have that carotid cardiovascular events of BP and and this for the at the carotid and for the at the of the carotid that by the at the and by the carotid prognostic in addition to that of prognostic of carotid has been reported in a of of the of cardiovascular which for about years has on the prognostic of arterial In the population, pulse wave with a in the risk of a cardiovascular Furthermore, of for cardiovascular events has been in for years of and wave such as BP and have been as of cardiovascular events in recent studies In in of these studies of and hypertensive only and cardiovascular for cardiovascular risk and carotid However, be that in most available the of BP pressure which the BP be considered in the of hypertensive in of further new the evidence on the prognostic of that available at the of the 2007 guidelines [1]. In the of in the with a of cardiovascular events and in the and with a in the of and cardiovascular events for cardiovascular risk and of in a of the to the of and to the different and more of the to the which only of The by the to be of and cardiovascular events in the large number of 2 in the were for the urinary protein excretion of the risk of cardiovascular events the in the risk of cardiovascular and events and evidence is available to the large of in of the prognostic of the in urinary protein as microalbuminuria In the and the microalbuminuria as important of cardiovascular the and in with microalbuminuria with those In the the of microalbuminuria with a In the a of to the with a and in the risk of cardiovascular cardiovascular and this the the to microalbuminuria The of urinary protein excretion and were of each other and the of microalbuminuria and about in for cardiovascular for cardiovascular and for of organ damage The 2007 European guidelines a number of of organ damage for which evidence of prognostic use in the could be because of of such as the cost and availability of the the and in the procedures, and in several the of of the and on the evidence available in the last 2 addition to the of organ damage in the 2007 guidelines can be the availability of more and the cost of their use about by In this the use of in a very recent in a of hypertensive cardiovascular disease has the information that are more and subclinical and in the of other of organ damage evidence these to a of importance because of the of the more and more in diagnostic procedures, disease is to more in prognostic and studies in hypertension. The prognostic of alterations in has been by studies However, the of this measurement of this A new for the of for evaluation to be on a of a that has been actively in the In a of individuals cardiovascular disease with hypertension and with the of the of cardiovascular this of cardiovascular risk factors in the large of of the Health added very to the prognostic of risk factors On the have reported that in a of hypertensive for about of the the with a in cardiovascular events for cardiovascular risk However, the of have reported that in the of hypertensive of cardiovascular events because in different have a different prognostic the prognostic of in hypertension to be further be that the addition of new of organ damage to the assessment of total cardiovascular risk only the of their prognostic importance, has to the to the of cardiovascular is by to be and are available that in some new risk factors of prognostic added to the the by which cardiovascular risk can be thus only the diagnostic procedures more and is by the recent results of the which that of to in the and by which total cardiovascular risk organ damage as a of cardiovascular risk subclinical organ damage the of cardiovascular risk, the the patient into the that risk of at least cardiovascular events in years patients. The 2007 European guidelines hypertensive with subclinical organ damage those with a total cardiovascular is further by more recent evidence on the contribution of subclinical and damage to the total cardiovascular to subclinical of the by some of the studies that in hypertensive of the is with of cardiovascular events to or in years in years has been reported for for with in the in the hypertensive of the with a of cardiovascular events of with the in evidence for In the of the Health the of cardiovascular events the carotid or more and and in those with in the In the hypertensive of the the of and cardiovascular events in years carotid in the third and or at least been In with in the or the cardiovascular events in In hypertensive the of cardiovascular events or more and in those with in the and Furthermore, asymptomatic disease as by a has been to be in with of cardiovascular events in years and recent evidence that in hypertensive subclinical organ damage is with a risk of cardiovascular events of or has been reported some years that by a serum more is with a of cardiovascular events or more In the recent of hypertensive a with cardiovascular events of about in with Furthermore, in the hypertensive by the of disease in years in the of microalbuminuria and of only in in the the of cardiovascular events in only in those individuals in microalbuminuria in the with in the of these hypertension. The 2007 European guidelines with subclinical organ damage as at risk BP is in the evidence that this is the is In the of the information available on the prognostic of in the and hypertensive Furthermore, in the population, the of with cardiovascular events for cardiovascular risk BP In the microalbuminuria with only a cardiovascular in that a risk to the and in the individuals of the a microalbuminuria the with a rate of cardiovascular events of only in years with a rate in individuals with microalbuminuria the of of subclinical organ damage The 2007 European guidelines have that of organ damage the of cardiovascular that organ damage be to the in the in which hypertensive in treatment by of or a in cardiovascular those in or to that in and in other studies a in and or cardiovascular with in treatment or in with a of cardiovascular events and to Since 2007, on the in damage and cardiovascular have been by further of the which have that in left left ventricular and in of with cardiovascular rate Furthermore, have been that in in treatment cardiovascular the of in the carotid has for the been in a recent of to a of the of these with the large in to conclusions The of in with cardiovascular has been by some of the In this on a large number of or very cardiovascular risk the with a of angiotensin-converting and the in the on with or the other this by a in cardiovascular events and with in events However, these results the important that in can be a of the more or of treatment because for the results are in most a and few which in a very number of the that for that Furthermore, in the very cardiovascular risk the of the system by the and might have of that and the with a in In of this are some recent of the in with 2 In these of a with and cardiovascular the contribution of to the of on the important prognostic of subclinical organ damage to In hypertensive and the population, the of and a carotid or arterial a by the or microalbuminuria or the total cardiovascular risk, hypertensive into the risk The in or by treatment the on cardiovascular information on are more or by the treatment some recent results evidence that this is the for in urinary protein the for the of subclinical organ damage is of crucial importance in the hypertensive assessment can use of simple and cheap procedures that can routine information and at can on more that can further and In organ damage assessment is useful because of the evidence that in the of of organ damage to the cardiovascular risk be more with to the cardiovascular risk is published subclinical organ damage can total cardiovascular risk to the in with However, organ damage is or or is by risk is with a or in risk in individuals and the 2007 guidelines recommend risk as a for the of treatment in and patients. In this is important to that the of organ damage in that decide to the of several studies that the of cardiovascular events is in in hypertensive for cardiovascular risk factors and is with the that antihypertensive treatment a total risk to a the that in treatment is organ damage is use of organ damage assessment thus to a more about the of treatment and thus Some of the discussed in of subclinical organ damage for stratification of total cardiovascular risk are summarized in Box guidelines on the management of hypertension recommend the of antihypertensive in with a or more a or and to the treatment in order for the to be these They further recommend drug treatment to be a BP that a and and a and in with or a of cardiovascular or at The 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines have these recommendations with information on the evidence are and a critical of this has been by of the in the of further information by recent The of the ESH document is to the and the of evidence on which these recommendations are and thus the and of studies which possible evidence to antihypertensive treatment recommend use of antihypertensive in with hypertension at or cardiovascular risk, that BP is and and treatment has However, be that the evidence in of this recommendation is because trials of on BP could be those hypertension or the recent which in the 2007 guidelines to in with cardiovascular risk, evidence because BP a large of antihypertensive at and a number of evidence of organ damage or a of cardiovascular to the or that the BP threshold for drug treatment is to and recommend antihypertensive at at least or at least in the as However, as in is on hypertensive that with a in the hypertension can be that current guidelines recommendations on BP at which to drug treatment in the are on results other and by the large of antihypertensive in available trials in the at initial blood and at in antihypertensive treatment trials in the is for the guidelines recommendation to drug treatment in the BP have are on the results of the of the which has important as a the the the in and a of cardiovascular events in the randomized to more treatment to the of to other cardiovascular of large and However, in by BP were and the of cardiovascular in the in the of antihypertensive treatment in with or in those in this were stratification on the or of a of hypertension. have been recommendations to antihypertensive treatment at BP in with previous have been on the the that in with a previous or BP by a in the of and cardiovascular events in hypertensive and patients. However, in this hypertension by of or and in a a in with treatment only or more Furthermore, BP in were reported of treatment in of the and be to on of treatment in patients. the of evidence of has been by the results of a more recent large of antihypertensive treatment in with the these results be to a more in a more discussed in the 2007 European guidelines and further in a recent trials are available the information drug treatment be at BP in with disease is in most to the of the to the which were in these were subdivided for their or BP on a of antihypertensive drug administration, and thus the to a BP the results and trials pressure The evidence available on the BP of antihypertensive treatment has been by some of this and is summarized in in the in of trials in hypertensive to in the actively at or this in the or In of the BP with a in and in this for that were and the in a previous were at or cardiovascular risk and with this evidence the recommendation of guidelines to to in the of with or 2 hypertension and or total cardiovascular this recommendation to hypertensive is by in the of in trials the of hypertensive randomized to more treatment a of cardiovascular in the only with results the were to is evidence in of the guidelines recommendation to the target in patients. The of that the guidelines recommendation to BP in with or a of cardiovascular disease is by the recommendation in of treatment to the by some such as and a of cardiovascular for a BP in in hypertensive patients. in the of only in were and were with a in cardiovascular results trials in with a of or disease with the that in some trials in which to with the with of of trials and trials on organ damage on BP and for drug treatment has been of trials and studies on the of treatment on organ damage of prognostic importance, this is of the of cardiovascular events in to the BP by treatment have been in the large of hypertensive of the in the cardiovascular risk for the the and the and in the with of the In the the of cardiovascular events at a of and a of In the hypertensive in the BP a in the of cardiovascular events and with to the in BP these of the of treatment In the the of cardiovascular events as the of in which BP to be were for and The cardiovascular with a for cardiovascular events to as the to about On the in the of BP were initial were for were and at each initial a BP by a cardiovascular However, in in initial in the the and for have been reported for the of in in the with of the of to to cardiovascular and to of as well as in disease to the BP and subclinical organ the have that the of is to the BP by treatment, the for large BP the A published has that of is by as with BP and in hypertensive Furthermore, several studies have evidence that antihypertensive treatment is by a or a in urinary protein be in the or initial BP is The most recent evidence has been by the which has that in most of antihypertensive treatment, further BP by the addition of and the of of the the or the of urinary protein a of initial systolic or diastolic BP to The for a and in the actively as with the at initial or and Furthermore, this of the has the risk of a to as the treatment to of about The has been some a for of on the of some trials as well as of the results of other trials on have the that in at cardiovascular risk, antihypertensive treatment that to or and be by a further in the of that by a has to the as to BP is and in of cardiovascular The is to the a BP which organ is studies in of cardiovascular disease that the BP and cardiovascular rate is to very BP which are only by antihypertensive is possible that in cardiovascular risk of the that blood the BP threshold which organ is However, the of this be different in to the of organ damage and has been by trials to the of more BP for initial and of results the that in the in which BP could have been a initial cardiovascular risk that the BP and the of cardiovascular this is by the evidence of a in of several trials these the of cardiovascular by a of BP that is and and suggesting that this BP the in cardiovascular are is in with the results of studies that the BP and cardiovascular events is cardiovascular events are on a which at BP the 2007 recommendations the evidence is to in hypertensive at and risk, drug be BP to or a suitable with with the to BP this of antihypertensive treatment in hypertension for BP to to 2 or organ damage to is by a recent of trials with antihypertensive agents has that in trials on cardiovascular risk the that the risk by lipid-lowering and antiplatelet can very the a cardiovascular events in by a initial risk On the in trials hypertensive at initial or risk, the could be to in which that of antihypertensive be threshold and target for drug treatment in the the current availability of well BP to be with in or in cardiovascular or of antihypertensive drug in with BP is by is the for the BP recommended for in large and are more in the subclinical organ and microalbuminuria and to be the to decide the BP for treatment as well as treatment in patients. and at least the of studies such as which the of BP or are be useful to recommend that in be well that are be in with the results of the in which the and of antihypertensive treatment were in in to with on in at recommendations can be to with previous cardiovascular for current evidence is of antihypertensive drug treatment BP is in the and the of at a BP target of has been in those with a BP that the 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines as at cardiovascular risk because of the of risk or subclinical organ has been that this BP subclinical organ damage to a cardiovascular risk, and is this The evidence in of in these is to that reported by the and the studies in which of antihypertensive drug the of hypertension the of the this be pursued with or with addition of antihypertensive agents last recommendations for a number of of patient management randomized trials can only for a few years and of the results to the of is The to into that the of antihypertensive treatment more with because of organ damage has a in with the of large and with a BP to be by the results of the few trials in which were for a number of years of randomized In the and for the of antihypertensive treatment on the of cardiovascular events years of the of the the that antihypertensive treatment in the A which is to as the has been reported for the 2 which reported a on the and of 2 years of with that antihypertensive and in the a of the of a previous blood in The most important points to threshold and target BP for treatment are summarized in and of antihypertensive In their and 2007 [1], the European guidelines the large number of randomized trials of antihypertensive those treatment and those treatment on different They that the of antihypertensive treatment are to of BP and are of the well as and and can BP and and cardiovascular these are suitable for the and of antihypertensive treatment as or in some combinations with each of the of the of antihypertensive and of agents a has been a in the by the of a by in and in the with the as for and the of by their has been by different of on a possible of and as well as on the possible of for and of for disease to possible or of new and is of and and be by of guidelines On the be to of the of The evidence which have been as antihypertensive and in the recommendations discussed in the 2007 European on the of in antihypertensive have been added since In a of of randomized trials of a has been reported the rate by and cardiovascular the the the the of and to be by On the a recent of randomized trials only a of in with other a as other agents on events and and a other in with a recent Furthermore, the recent publication of a of the and in has the of cardiovascular to be in on the or the with a in the is with of large of on different antihypertensive treatment for in randomized that the of cardiovascular on treatment on other antihypertensive agents has been of the possible of a BP by treatment in those trials in which to have a on of on in the of the that the very to the because of the in and On the to be to other antihypertensive agents in their to A recent more hypertensive different has a of in However, studies for the be with with other antihypertensive agents because of a wave to to be on antihypertensive management be because the and is to at hypertension and antihypertensive treatment are most is that as well as have and in such as those with the or The importance of this have been by the results of most studies and trials have been that by of in or in to of or with a blood a recent of the has that new of at the of this in at are by a number of in which of at at the of the However, the for Furthermore, is the as with some studies that with have a of cardiovascular the and several years the conclusions in other studies is with other agents in trials subclinical organ damage as have been to be and in left ventricular carotid and and this be to in cardiovascular in the be that are a and that such as and to some of the for other and pulse pressure at the BP rate and because of the with has on BP In the on total and and at has been to and to have the as and have been in trials in in and of the of and in treatment by and in the the on or with in of microalbuminuria and to in hypertensive and has been to and left ventricular pressure in the hypertensive the cardiovascular by and in with is in hypertension to be in a A for in antihypertensive such as that to these in the is of The evidence that a BP by can types of cardiovascular events is be that most of the the of which has been the basis for on have to the of these drug the of and is to and has been have been in for their to organ and have been to or Furthermore, large studies that have the of of antihypertensive agents on to have to with the least or those by the least on treatment a recent has reported for for In the results of the be discussed in the drug combinations have as to are the of and The that be to other antihypertensive agents in has been on the basis of some and A to the that be to in has been On the has been that be to in these concepts, as well as their have been by the results of the very large cardiovascular treatment with or has to be to as as the of a are A of on and more recent trials the that and have the on The by the relatively BP by treatment is more to because in and for could a is to decide the has to be with the of the several years or with the of the on to The of with a of cardiovascular events in because prevalence of in to that in or because of a of and have some information on the of and on the of new in patients. the that has been to of new different and in and only and were in and in with to the However, most were other antihypertensive agents that have the of the these the that a have been the of a of events by the the On the some recent that these agents have some in is this can be to a or to a BP in the patients. is are in as is in several studies and large The recent by that trials in which a BP antihypertensive and the

BACKGROUND: Encephalitis has many causes, but for most patients the cause is unknown. We aimed to establish the cause and identify the clinical differences between causes in patients with encephalitis in England. METHODS: Patients of all ages and with symptoms suggestive of encephalitis were actively recruited for 2 years (staged start between October, 2005, and November, 2006) from 24 hospitals by clinical staff. Systematic laboratory testing included PCR and antibody assays for all commonly recognised causes of infectious encephalitis, investigation for less commonly recognised causes in immunocompromised patients, and testing for travel-related causes if indicated. We also tested for non-infectious causes for acute encephalitis including autoimmunity. A multidisciplinary expert team reviewed clinical presentation and hospital tests and directed further investigations. Patients were followed up for 6 months after discharge from hospital. FINDINGS: We identified 203 patients with encephalitis. Median age was 30 years (range 0-87). 86 patients (42%, 95% CI 35-49) had infectious causes, including 38 (19%, 14-25) herpes simplex virus, ten (5%, 2-9) varicella zoster virus, and ten (5%, 2-9) Mycobacterium tuberculosis; 75 (37%, 30-44) had unknown causes. 42 patients (21%, 15-27) had acute immune-mediated encephalitis. 24 patients (12%, 8-17) died, with higher case fatality for infections from M tuberculosis (three patients; 30%, 7-65) and varicella zoster virus (two patients; 20%, 2-56). The 16 patients with antibody-associated encephalitis had the worst outcome of all groups-nine (56%, 30-80) either died or had severe disabilities. Patients who died were more likely to be immunocompromised than were those who survived (OR = 3·44). INTERPRETATION: Early diagnosis of encephalitis is crucial to ensure that the right treatment is given on time. Extensive testing substantially reduced the proportion with unknown cause, but the proportion of cases with unknown cause was higher than that for any specific identified cause. FUNDING: The Policy Research Programme, Department of Health, UK.

Abstract The genetic make-up of an individual contributes to the susceptibility and response to viral infection. Although environmental, clinical and social factors have a role in the chance of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and the severity of COVID-19 1,2 , host genetics may also be important. Identifying host-specific genetic factors may reveal biological mechanisms of therapeutic relevance and clarify causal relationships of modifiable environmental risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and outcomes. We formed a global network of researchers to investigate the role of human genetics in SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity. Here we describe the results of three genome-wide association meta-analyses that consist of up to 49,562 patients with COVID-19 from 46 studies across 19 countries. We report 13 genome-wide significant loci that are associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection or severe manifestations of COVID-19. Several of these loci correspond to previously documented associations to lung or autoimmune and inflammatory diseases 3–7 . They also represent potentially actionable mechanisms in response to infection. Mendelian randomization analyses support a causal role for smoking and body-mass index for severe COVID-19 although not for type II diabetes. The identification of novel host genetic factors associated with COVID-19 was made possible by the community of human genetics researchers coming together to prioritize the sharing of data, results, resources and analytical frameworks. This working model of international collaboration underscores what is possible for future genetic discoveries in emerging pandemics, or indeed for any complex human disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and constellations of anatomic, pathophysiologic, and environmental factors involved in the development of incident diabetic foot ulcers in patients with diabetes and no history of foot ulcers from Manchester, U.K., and Seattle, Washington, research settings. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Rothman model of causation was applied to the diabetic foot ulcer condition. The presence of structural deformities, peripheral neuropathy, ischemia, infection, edema, and callus formation was determined for diabetic individuals with incident foot ulcers in Manchester and Seattle. Demographic, health, diabetes, and ulcer data were ascertained for each patient. A multidisciplinary group of foot specialists blinded to patient identity independently reviewed detailed abstracts to determine component and sufficient causes present and contributing to the development of each patient's foot ulcer. A modified Delphi process assisted the group in reaching consensus on component causes for each patient. Estimates of the proportion of ulcers that could be ascribed to each component cause were computed. RESULTS: From among 92 study patients from Manchester and 56 from Seattle, 32 unique causal pathways were identified. A critical triad (neuropathy, minor foot trauma, foot deformity) was present in > 63% of patient's causal pathways to foot ulcers. The components edema and ischemia contributed to the development of 37 and 35% of foot ulcers, respectively. Callus formation was associated with ulcer development in 30% of the pathways. Two unitary causes of ulcer were identified, with trauma and edema accounting for 6 and < 1% of ulcers, respectively. The majority of the lesions were on the plantar toes, forefoot, and midfoot. CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent component causes for lower-extremity ulcers were trauma, neuropathy, and deformity, which were present in a majority of patients. Clinicians are encouraged to use proven strategies to prevent and decrease the impact of modifiable conditions leading to foot ulcers in patients with diabetes.

AIMS: To determine the incidence of, and clinically relevant risk factors for, new foot ulceration in a large cohort of diabetic patients in the community healthcare setting. METHODS: Diabetic patients (n = 9710) underwent foot screening in six districts of North-west England in various healthcare settings. All were assessed at baseline for demographic information, medical and social history, neuropathy symptom score, neuropathy disability score, cutaneous pressure perception (insensitivity to the 10 g monofilament), foot deformities, and peripheral pulses. Two years later, patients were followed up via postal questionnaire to determine the incidence of new foot ulcers. Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis was used to determine the independent, relative risk of baseline variables for new foot ulceration. RESULTS: New foot ulcers occurred in 291/6613 patients who completed and returned their 2-year follow-up questionnaire (2.2% average annual incidence). The following factors were independently related to new foot ulcer risk: ulcer present at baseline (relative risk (95% confidence interval)) 5.32 (3.71-7.64), past history of ulcer 3.05 (2.16-4.31), abnormal neuropathy disability score (> or = 6/10) 2.32 (1.61-3.35), any previous podiatry attendance 2.19 (1.50-3.20), insensitivity to the 10 g monofilament 1.80 (1.36-2.39), reduced pulses 1.80 (1.40-2.32), foot deformities 1.57 (1.22-2.02), abnormal ankle reflexes 1.55 (1.01-2.36) and age 0.99 (0.98-1.00). CONCLUSIONS: More than 2% of community-based diabetic patients develop new foot ulcers each year. The neuropathy disability score, 10 g monofilament and palpation of foot pulses are recommended as screening tools in general practice.

Oxidative modification of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) enhances its uptake by macrophages in tissue culture and in vivo may underly the formation of arterial fatty streaks, the progenitors of atheroma. We investigated the possible protection which high-density lipoprotein (HDL) affords against LDL oxidation. The formation of lipoperoxides and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances when LDL was incubated with copper ions was significantly decreased by HDL. The enzyme, paraoxonase (E.C. 3.1.8.1), purified from human HDL, had a similar effect and thus may be the component of HDL responsible for decreasing the accumulation of lipid peroxidation products.

BACKGROUND: The pancreatic lesions of cystic fibrosis develop in utero and closely resemble those of chronic pancreatitis. Therefore, we hypothesized that mutations of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene may be more common than expected among patients with chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: We studied 134 consecutive patients with chronic pancreatitis (alcohol-related disease in 71, hyperparathyroidism in 2, hypertriglyceridemia in 1, and idiopathic disease in 60). We examined DNA for 22 mutations of the CFTR gene that together account for 95 percent of all mutations in patients with cystic fibrosis in the northwest of England. We also determined the length of the noncoding sequence of thymidines in intron 8, since the shorter the sequence, the lower the proportion of normal CFTR messenger RNA. RESULTS: The 94 male and 40 female patients ranged in age from 16 to 86 years. None had a mutation on both copies of the CFTR gene. Eighteen patients (13.4 percent), including 12 without alcoholism, had a CFTR mutation on one chromosome, as compared with a frequency of 5.3 percent among 600 local unrelated partners of persons with a family history of cystic fibrosis (P<0.001). A total of 10.4 percent of the patients had the 5T allele in intron 8 (14 of 134), which is twice the expected frequency (P=0.008). Four patients were heterozygous for both a CFTR mutation and the 5T allele. Patients with a CFTR mutation were younger than those with no mutations (P=0.03). None had the combination of sinopulmonary disease, high sweat electrolyte concentrations, and low nasal potential-difference values that are diagnostic of cystic fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations of the CFTR gene and the 5T genotype are associated with chronic pancreatitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine associations of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and obesity with adverse pregnancy outcomes in the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24 and 32 weeks. GDM was diagnosed post hoc using International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. Neonatal anthropometrics and cord serum C-peptide were measured. Adverse pregnancy outcomes included birth weight, newborn percent body fat, and cord C-peptide >90th percentiles, primary cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, and shoulder dystocia/birth injury. BMI was determined at the OGTT. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine associations of GDM and obesity with outcomes. RESULTS: Mean maternal BMI was 27.7, 13.7% were obese (BMI ≥33.0 kg/m(2)), and GDM was diagnosed in 16.1%. Relative to non-GDM and nonobese women, odds ratio for birth weight >90th percentile for GDM alone was 2.19 (1.93-2.47), for obesity alone 1.73 (1.50-2.00), and for both GDM and obesity 3.62 (3.04-4.32). Results for primary cesarean delivery and preeclampsia and for cord C-peptide and newborn percent body fat >90th percentiles were similar. Odds for birth weight >90th percentile were progressively greater with both higher OGTT glucose and higher maternal BMI. There was a 339-g difference in birth weight for babies of obese GDM women, compared with babies of normal/underweight women (64.2% of all women) with normal glucose based on a composite OGTT measure of fasting plasma glucose and 1- and 2-h plasma glucose values (61.8% of all women). CONCLUSIONS: Both maternal GDM and obesity are independently associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Their combination has a greater impact than either one alone.

BACKGROUND: An acceptable, standardised outcome measure to assess efficacy and effectiveness is needed across multiple disciplines offering psychological therapies. AIMS: To present psychometric data on reliability, validity and sensitivity to change for the CORE-OM (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation--Outcome Measure). METHOD: A 34-item self-report instrument was-developed, with domains of subjective well-being, symptoms, function and risk. Analysis includes internal reliability, test-retest reliability, socio-demographic differences, exploratory principal-component analysis, correlations with other instruments, differences between clinical and non-clinical samples and assessment of change within a clinical group. RESULTS: Internal and test-retest reliability were good (0.75-0.95), as was convergent validity with seven other instruments, with large differences between clinical and non-clinical samples and good sensitivity to change. CONCLUSIONS: The CORE-OM is a reliable and valid instrument with good sensitivity to change. It is acceptable in a wide range of practice settings.

Presents case reports of a 67‐yr‐old man and 2 women (aged 60 and 66 yrs) with primary cerebral atrophy in whom progressive breakdown in language and visual perception are attributed to loss of semantic information. This form of dementia is distinct from that of Alzheimer′s disease and is assumed to represent a form of circumscribed cerebral atrophy with emphasis of pathology in temporal rather than frontal regions of the brain.

CONTEXT: The cause of declining testosterone (T) in aging men and their relationships with risk factors are unclear. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the relationships between lifestyle and health with reproductive hormones in aging men. DESIGN: This was a baseline cross-sectional survey on 3200 community-dwelling men aged 40-79 yr from a prospective cohort study in eight European countries. RESULTS: Four predictors were associated with distinct modes of altered function: 1) age: lower free T (FT; -3.12 pmol/liter.yr, P < 0.001) with raised LH, suggesting impaired testicular function; 2) obesity: lower total T (TT; -2.32 nmol/liter) and FT (-17.60 pmol/liter) for body mass index (BMI; > or = 25 to < 30 kg/m(2)) and lower TT (-5.09 nmol/liter) and FT (-53.72 pmol/liter) for BMI 30 kg/m(2) or greater (P < 0.001-0.01, referent: BMI < 25 kg/m(2)) with unchanged/decreased LH, indicating hypothalamus/pituitary dysfunction; 3) comorbidity: lower TT (-0.80 nmol/liter, P < 0.01) with unchanged LH in younger men but higher LH in older men; and 4) smoking: higher SHBG (5.96 nmol/liter, P < 0.001) and LH (0.77 U/liter, P < 0.01) with increased TT (1.31 nmol/liter, P < 0.001) but not FT, compatible with a resetting of T-LH-negative feedback due to elevated SHBG. CONCLUSIONS: Complex multiple alterations in the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis function exist in aging men against a background of progressive age-related testicular impairment. These changes are differentially linked to specific risk factors. Some risk factors operate independently of but others interact with age, in contributing to the T decline. These potentially modifiable risk factors suggest possible preventative measures to maintain T during aging in men.

The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) is one of the most frequently employed measures for assessing pain-related fear in back pain patients. Despite its widespread use, there is relatively little data to support the psychometric properties of the English version of this scale. This study investigated the psychometric properties of the English version of the TSK in a sample of chronic low back pain patients. Item analysis revealed that four items possessed low item total correlations (4, 8, 12, 16) and four items had response trends that deviated from a pattern of normal distribution (4, 9, 12, 14). Consequently, we tested the psychometric properties of a shorter version of the TSK (TSK-11), having excluded the six psychometrically poor items. The psychometric properties of this measure were compared to those of the original TSK. Both measures demonstrated good internal consistency (TSK: alpha=0.76; TSK-11: alpha=0.79), test-retest reliability (TSK: ICC=0.82, SEM=3.16; TSK-11: ICC=0.81, SEM=2.54), responsiveness (TSK: SRM=-1.19; TSK-11: SRM=-1.11), concurrent validity and predictive validity. In respect of specific cut-off scores, a reduction of at least four points on both measures maximised the likelihood of correctly identifying an important reduction in fear of movement. Overall, the TSK-11 possessed similar psychometric properties to the original TSK and offered the advantage of brevity. Further research is warranted to investigate the utility of the new instrument and the cut-off scores in a wider group of chronic pain patients in different clinical settings.

ropathic pain (7–10), and this and other putative mechanisms will be discussed. The clinical features, diagnosis, and management of the focal and multifocal neuropathies will be described. A major portion of this review will discuss the clinical features, assessment, and management of the patient with the most common form of DN, diabetic distal sensory polyneuropathy (DPN). The late sequelae of DPN and their prevention will also be described. Finally, practical guidelines for the screening of DPN in clinical practice will be provided. For further details on this topic, please refer to recent reviews (11– 18).

Many important decisions on hypertension management must currently be taken without the support of evidence&#13;\nfrom large randomized controlled trials. The following issues appear in urgent need to be approached by simply&#13;\ndesigned trials.&#13;\n(1) Should antihypertensive drugs be prescribed to all patients with grade 1 hypertension, even when total&#13;\ncardiovascular risk is relatively low or moderate? Because of the very low rate of cardiovascular events&#13;\nexpected in these patients, a placebo-controlled trial using intermediate endpoints such as signs of organ&#13;\ndamage of recognized prognostic importance would be feasible, ethical, and clinically relevant.&#13;\n(2) Should antihypertensive drugs be prescribed to the elderly with grade 1 hypertension, and should antihypertensive&#13;\ntreatment achieve a goal of below 140/90mmHg also in the elderly? These trials could make use&#13;\nof hard cardiovascular outcomes and could be placebo-controlled.&#13;\n(3) Should antihypertensive drug treatment be started in diabetic patients or in patients with previous cerebrovascular&#13;\nor cardiovascular disease when BP is still in the high normal level, and should BP goal be below 130/&#13;\n80mmHg in these patients? These issues can be approached by placebo-controlled trials because no trial&#13;\nevidence is still available on the benefit of lowering high normal BP or of achieving BP goals below 130/&#13;\n80mmHg.&#13;\n(4) What are the lowest safe BP values to achieve by treatment in different clinical conditions? This issue should&#13;\nbe approached by trials comparing more or less intense BP-lowering treatment strategies in patients with&#13;\ndifferent cardiovascular risk levels.&#13;\n(5) Are lifestyle measures known to reduce BP also capable of reducing morbidity and mortality in hypertension?&#13;\nA controlled randomized trial using intermediate endpoints (organ damage) would be feasible and desirable&#13;\nin patients with high normal BP or grade 1 hypertension.