Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases

OBJECTIVE: Disease status, in terms of disease activity, disease progression and prognosis is difficult to define in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). No gold standard exists. Therefore, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), a self-administered instrument, has been developed as a new approach to defining disease activity in patients with AS. METHODS: The index, designed by a multidisciplinary team with input from patients, consists of six 10 cm horizontal visual analog scales to measure severity of fatigue, spinal and peripheral joint pain, localized tenderness and morning stiffness (both qualitative and quantitative). The final BASDAI score has a range of 0 to 10. The index was distributed to a cross section of patients, including inpatients receiving 3 weeks of intensive physiotherapy treatment and hospital outpatients. BASDAI was completed by a total of 154 patients. Validation of the new instrument was achieved through analysis of user friendliness, reliability (consistency), score distribution and sensitivity to change. Comparisons were made with a previous Bath disease activity index (DAI) and the Newcastle Enthesis Index. RESULTS: The BASDAI was found by patients to be quick and simple to complete (mean: 67 s). Test-retest reliability was good (r = 0.93; p < 0.001), as was the distribution of scores across the scale (score range: 0.5-10; mean: 4.31). BASDAI was sensitive to change, reflecting a 16% (mean) improvement in inpatient scores after 3 weeks of treatment. It is superior to the DAI in terms of construct and content validity and to the Enthesis Index in all aspects. CONCLUSION: In summary, BASDAI is user friendly, reliability, sensitive to change and reflects the entire spectrum of disease. It is a comprehensive self-administered instrument for assessing disease activity in AS.

OBJECTIVE: To develop and perform an initial validation of a damage index for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: A list of items considered to reflect damage in SLE was generated through a nominal group process. A consensus as to which items to be included in an index was reached, together with rules for ascertainment. Each center submitted 2 assessments, 5 years apart, on 2 patients with active and 2 with inactive disease, of whom 1 had increased damage and the other had stable disease. Analysis of variance was used to test the factors physician, time, amount of damage, and activity status. RESULTS: Nineteen physicians completed the damage index on 42 case scenarios. The analysis revealed that the damage index could identify changes in damage seen in patients with both active and inactive disease. Patients who had active disease at both time points had a higher increase in damage. There was good agreement among the physicians on the assessment of damage in these patients. CONCLUSION: This damage index for SLE records damage occurring in patients with SLE regardless of its cause. The index was demonstrated to have content, face, criterion, and discriminant validity.

Classification criteria for most of the disorders belonging to the spondylarthropathy group already exist. However, the spectrum of spondylarthropathy is wider than the sum of these disorders suggests. Seronegative oligoarthritis, dactylitis or polyarthritis of the lower extremities, heel pain due to enthesitis, and other undifferentiated cases of spondylarthropathy have been ignored in epidemiologic studies because of the inadequacy of existing criteria. In order to define classification criteria that also encompass patients with undifferentiated spondylarthropathy, we studied 403 patients with all forms of spondylarthropathy and 674 control patients with other rheumatic diseases. The diagnoses were based on the local clinical expert's opinion. The 403 patients included 168 with ankylosing spondylitis, 68 with psoriatic arthritis, 41 with reactive arthritis, 17 with inflammatory bowel disease and arthritis, and 109 with unclassified spondylarthropathy. Based on statistical analysis and clinical reasoning, we propose the following classification criteria for spondylarthropathy: inflammatory spinal pain or synovitis (asymmetric or predominantly in the lower limbs), together with at least 1 of the following: positive family history, psoriasis, inflammatory bowel disease, urethritis, or acute diarrhea, alternating buttock pain, enthesopathy, or sacroiliitis as determined from radiography of the pelvic region. These criteria resulted in a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 87%. The proposed classification criteria are easy to apply in clinical practice and performed well in all 7 participating centers. However, we regard them as preliminary until they have been further evaluated in other settings.

OBJECTIVE: After pain and stiffness, one of the most important complaints of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is disability. The main aims of treatment are to control pain but also to improve function. Various methods of assessing function exist but are either not specific for the disease or have not been adequately validated. As a result of this deficiency we developed the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) as a new approach to defining and monitoring functional ability in patients with AS. METHODS: This self-assessment instrument was designed by a team of medical professionals in conjunction with patients, and consists of 8 specific questions regarding function in AS and 2 questions reflecting the patient's ability to cope with everyday life. Each question is answered on a 10 cm horizontal visual analog scale, the mean of which gives the BASFI score (0-10). The questionnaire was completed 257 times in total: once by 116 outpatients and by 47 inpatients on 3 occasions over a 3-week intensive physiotherapy course. In addition, the instrument was compared with the Dougados functional index. RESULTS: Patients scores covered 95% of the BASFI range, giving a normal distribution of results. In contrast only 65% of the Dougados functional index scale was used. Furthermore, over the 3 week period of inpatient treatment, the BASFI revealed a significant improvement in function (20%, p = 0.004) while there was a less impressive change in the Dougados functional index (6%, p = 0.03). This demonstrates the superior sensitivity of the BASFI: Consistency was good for both indices (p < 0.001), as was the relationship between patient perception of function and function as assessed by an external observer (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The BASFI satisfies the criteria required of a functional index: it is quick and easy to complete, is reliable and is sensitive to change across the whole spectrum of disease.

OBJECTIVE: Different sets of diagnostic criteria have been proposed for Sjögren's syndrome (SS), but none have been validated with a large series of patients or in a multicenter study. We conducted the present study involving 26 centers from 12 countries (11 in Europe, plus Israel), with the goals of reaching a consensus on the diagnostic procedures for SS and defining classification criteria to be used in epidemiologic surveys and adopted by the scientific community. METHODS: The study protocol was subdivided into two parts. For part I, questionnaires regarding both ocular and oral involvement were developed; they included 13 questions and 7 questions, respectively. For part II a limited set of diagnostic tests was selected, and the exact procedure to be followed in performing these tests was defined. Part I of the study included 240 patients with primary SS and 240 age- and sex-matched controls. Two hundred forty-six patients with primary SS, 201 with secondary SS, 113 with connective tissue diseases but without associated SS, and 133 control patients were studied in part II. RESULTS: The study resulted in (a) the validation of a simple 6-item questionnaire for determination of dry eyes and dry mouth, which showed good discriminant power between patients and controls, to be used in the initial screening for sicca syndrome; and (b) the definition of a new set of criteria for the classification of SS. The sensitivity and specificity of the criteria in correctly identifying patients with either the primary or the secondary variant of SS were also determined. CONCLUSION: Using the findings of this prospective multicenter European study, general agreement can be reached on the diagnostic procedures to be used for patients with SS. Final validation of the preliminary classification criteria for SS is underway.

Acceptance of chronic pain entails that an individual reduce unsuccessful attempts to avoid or control pain and focus instead on participation in valued activities and the pursuit of personally relevant goals. Recent research suggests that pain-related acceptance leads to enhanced emotional and physical functioning in chronic pain patients above and beyond the influence of depression, pain intensity, and coping. In these studies, acceptance was measured using the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). Preliminary analyses of the CPAQ have supported its psychometric properties. The present study sought to further refine the CPAQ by examining its factor structure and evaluating the relations of these factors to other indices of pain-related distress and disability. Although a previously demonstrated factor structure of the CPAQ was generally supported, only factors assessing (a) the degree to which one engaged in life activities regardless of the pain and (b) willingness to experience pain had adequate reliability and validity and were significantly related to the other measures of patient functioning. A revised version of the CPAQ is suggested.

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are characterized by muscle weakness, skin disease and internal organ involvement. Autoimmunity is known to have a role in myositis pathogenesis, and myositis-specific autoantibodies, targeting important intracellular proteins, are regarded as key biomarkers aiding in the diagnosis of patients. In recent years, a number of novel myositis autoantibodies including anti-TIF1, anti-NXP2, anti-MDA5, anti-SAE, anti-HMGCR and anti-cN1A have been identified in both adult and juvenile patients. These autoantibodies correlate with distinct clinical manifestations and importantly are found in inclusion body, statin-induced, clinically amyopathic and juvenile groups of myositis patients, previously believed to be mainly autoantibody negative. In this review, we will describe the main myositis-specific and myositis-associated autoantibodies and their frequencies and clinical associations across different ages and ethnic groups. We will also discuss preliminary studies investigating correlations between specific myositis autoantibody titres and clinical markers of disease course, collectively demonstrating the utility of myositis autoantibodies as both diagnostic and prognostic markers of disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the most appropriate clinical measurements for the assessment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) to develop the new metrology index. METHODS: One hundred and ninety-three individuals with AS were studied. The patients reflected the entire spectrum of cases of AS. Metrology was performed on 327 occasions. First the metrology (20 measurements) of 43 patients was analyzed. From this, 5 simple clinical measurements were defined which most accurately reflect axial status: cervical rotation, tragus to wall distance, lateral flexion, modified Schober's, and intermalleolar distance. These measurements were assessed for reliability, speed and both inter and intraobserver variability in another 40 patients. RESULTS: Analysis of the first group of 43 patients and a subsequent group of 54 patients, using the 5 measurements that constitute this new Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI), demonstrated that they accurately and reliably mirror the 20 clinical measurements assessed previously (r = 0.92, p < 0.001). In a new group of 40 patients the measurements were demonstrated to be accurate and reproducible for both intraobserver variability (r = 0.99, p < 0.001) and interobserver variability (r = 0.97, p < 0.001). In a further 56 patients, admitted for inpatient therapy, an improvement in the BASMI from 3.34 (SD 2.71) to 2.16 (SD 2.42) was noted over a period of 3 weeks (regardless of disease severity) which indicates a sensitivity to change (chi 2 = 6.55, p < 0.01). The mean improvement over baseline was about 30%. CONCLUSION: Five clinical measurements provide a composite index (BASMI) and define disease status in AS. The BASMI is quick (7 min), reproducible and sensitive to change across the disease spectrum.

OBJECTIVES: Develop recommendations for women's health issues and family planning in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and/or antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: Systematic review of evidence followed by modified Delphi method to compile questions, elicit expert opinions and reach consensus. RESULTS: Family planning should be discussed as early as possible after diagnosis. Most women can have successful pregnancies and measures can be taken to reduce the risks of adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. Risk stratification includes disease activity, autoantibody profile, previous vascular and pregnancy morbidity, hypertension and the use of drugs (emphasis on benefits from hydroxychloroquine and antiplatelets/anticoagulants). Hormonal contraception and menopause replacement therapy can be used in patients with stable/inactive disease and low risk of thrombosis. Fertility preservation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues should be considered prior to the use of alkylating agents. Assisted reproduction techniques can be safely used in patients with stable/inactive disease; patients with positive antiphospholipid antibodies/APS should receive anticoagulation and/or low-dose aspirin. Assessment of disease activity, renal function and serological markers is important for diagnosing disease flares and monitoring for obstetrical adverse outcomes. Fetal monitoring includes Doppler ultrasonography and fetal biometry, particularly in the third trimester, to screen for placental insufficiency and small for gestational age fetuses. Screening for gynaecological malignancies is similar to the general population, with increased vigilance for cervical premalignant lesions if exposed to immunosuppressive drugs. Human papillomavirus immunisation can be used in women with stable/inactive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations for women's health issues in SLE and/or APS were developed using an evidence-based approach followed by expert consensus.

OBJECTIVE: To update the 2009 Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations for the spectrum of manifestations affecting patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: GRAPPA rheumatologists, dermatologists, and PsA patients drafted overarching principles for the management of PsA, based on consensus achieved at face-to-face meetings and via online surveys. We conducted literature reviews regarding treatment for the key domains of PsA (arthritis, spondylitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin disease, and nail disease) and convened a new group to identify pertinent comorbidities and their effect on treatment. Finally, we drafted treatment recommendations for each of the clinical manifestations and assessed the level of agreement for the overarching principles and treatment recommendations among GRAPPA members, using an online questionnaire. RESULTS: Six overarching principles had ≥80% agreement among both health care professionals (n = 135) and patient research partners (n = 10). We developed treatment recommendations and a schema incorporating these principles for arthritis, spondylitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin disease, nail disease, and comorbidities in the setting of PsA, using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation process. Agreement of >80% was reached for approval of the individual recommendations and the overall schema. CONCLUSION: We present overarching principles and updated treatment recommendations for the key manifestations of PsA, including related comorbidities, based on a literature review and consensus of GRAPPA members (rheumatologists, dermatologists, other health care providers, and patient research partners). Further updates are anticipated as the therapeutic landscape in PsA evolves.

OBJECTIVE: A 2-year randomized controlled trial was performed to test the hypothesis that long-term, continuous treatment with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), in comparison with NSAID treatment on demand only, influences radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Patients with AS (n = 215), who had previously participated in a 6-week, randomized, double-blind clinical trial that compared celecoxib, ketoprofen, and placebo, were randomly allocated to receive either continuous treatment with NSAIDs or on-demand treatment with NSAIDs for a period of 2 years. All patients began treatment with celecoxib, at a starting dosage of 100 mg twice daily; patients could increase this dosage to 200 mg twice daily or could switch to another NSAID while maintaining the same treatment strategy. Structural changes were assessed by radiographs of the lumbar and cervical spine and scored according to the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score by one observer who was blinded to the treatment strategy and temporal order of the radiographs. Statistical analyses included a between-group comparison of 1) radiographic progression scores (by Mann-Whitney U test), 2) time-averaged values of variables reflecting signs and symptoms of AS (by linear regression analysis), and 3) the frequency of reported site-specific adverse events (by chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate). RESULTS: Complete sets of radiographs were available for 76 of the 111 patients in the continuous-treatment group and for 74 of the 104 patients in the on-demand group. The mean +/- SD scores for radiographic progression were 0.4 +/- 1.7 in the continuous-treatment group and 1.5 +/- 2.5 in the on-demand treatment group (P = 0.002). Parameters reflecting signs and symptoms were not statistically significantly different between groups. The between-group difference in radiographic progression did not disappear after adjusting for baseline values of radiographic damage or disease activity variables and for time-averaged values of disease activity variables, nor after input of missing data. Relevant adverse events tended to occur more frequently in the continuous-treatment group than in the on-demand group (for hypertension, 9% versus 3%; for abdominal pain, 11% versus 6%; for dyspepsia, 41% versus 38%), but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: A strategy of continuous use of NSAIDs reduces radiographic progression in symptomatic patients with AS, without increasing toxicity substantially.

OBJECTIVE: The lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pulmonary fibrosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc) has hampered an evidence-based approach to treatment. This RCT was undertaken to investigate the effects of intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide (CYC) followed by azathioprine (AZA) treatment in pulmonary fibrosis in SSc. METHODS: Forty-five patients were randomized to receive low-dose prednisolone and 6 infusions (monthly) of CYC followed by oral AZA, or placebo. Primary outcome measures were change in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) and change in single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). Secondary outcome measures included changes in appearance on high-resolution computed tomography and dyspnea scores. An intent-to-treat statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: At baseline, there were no significant group differences in factors linked to outcome, including severity of pulmonary fibrosis and autoantibody status. Sixty-two percent of the patients completed the first year of treatment. Withdrawals included 9 patients (6 from the placebo group) with significant decline in lung function, 2 with treatment side effects (both from the active treatment group), and 6 with non-trial-related comorbidity. No hemorrhagic cystitis or bone marrow suppression was observed. Estimation of the relative treatment effect (active treatment versus placebo) adjusted for baseline FVC and treatment center revealed a favorable outcome for FVC of 4.19%; this between-group difference showed a trend toward statistical significance (P = 0.08). No improvements in DLCO or secondary outcome measures were identified. CONCLUSION: This trial did not demonstrate significant improvement in the primary or secondary end points in the active treatment group versus the group receiving placebo. However, for FVC there was a trend toward statistical significance between the 2 groups. This suggests that treatment of pulmonary fibrosis in SSc with low-dose prednisolone and IV CYC followed by AZA stabilizes lung function in a subset of patients with the disease. Therapy was well tolerated with no increase in serious adverse events.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative effects of genetic and environmental factors in susceptibility to ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: Twins with AS were identified from the Royal National Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases database. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed to establish diagnoses, and disease severity was assessed using a combination of validated scoring systems. HLA typing for HLA-B27, HLA-B60, and HLA-DR1 was performed by polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers, and zygosity was assessed using microsatellite markers. Genetic and environmental variance components were assessed with the program Mx, using data from this and previous studies of twins with AS. RESULTS: Six of 8 monozygotic (MZ) twin pairs were disease concordant, compared with 4 of 15 B27-positive dizygotic (DZ) twin pairs (27%) and 4 of 32 DZ twin pairs overall (12.5%). Nonsignificant increases in similarity with regard to age at disease onset and all of the disease severity scores assessed were noted in disease-concordant MZ twins compared with concordant DZ twins. HLA-B27 and B60 were associated with the disease in probands, and the rate of disease concordance was significantly increased among DZ twin pairs in which the co-twin was positive for both B27 and DR1. Additive genetic effects were estimated to contribute 97% of the population variance. CONCLUSION: Susceptibility to AS is largely genetically determined, and the environmental trigger for the disease is probably ubiquitous. HLA-B27 accounts for a minority of the overall genetic susceptibility to AS.

Research and treatment of chronic pain over the past 20 or more years have tended to focus on patient coping as the primary behavioral contribution to adjustment. The purpose of the present study was to compare a coping approach to chronic pain with a different behavioral approach referred to as acceptance of chronic pain. These approaches were compared in terms of their ability to predict distress and disability in a sample of patients seeking treatment for chronic pain. Subjects were 230 adults assessed at a university pain management center. All patients completed the coping strategies questionnaire and the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire among other standard measures. Results showed that coping variables were relatively weakly related to acceptance of pain and relatively unreliably related to pain adjustment variables. On the other hand, acceptance of chronic pain was associated with less pain, disability, depression and pain-related anxiety, higher daily uptime, and better work status. Regression analyses examined the independent contributions of coping and acceptance to key adjustment indicators in relation to chronic pain. Results from these analyses demonstrated that acceptance of pain repeatedly accounted for more variance than coping variables.

OBJECTIVE: To develop comprehensive recommendations for the treatment of the various clinical manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) based on evidence obtained from a systematic review of the literature and from consensus opinion. METHODS: Formal literature reviews of treatment for the most significant discrete clinical manifestations of PsA (skin and nails, peripheral arthritis, axial disease, dactylitis and enthesitis) were performed and published by members of the Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA). Treatment recommendations were drafted for each of the clinical manifestations by rheumatologists, dermatologists and PsA patients based on the literature reviews and consensus opinion. The level of agreement for the individual treatment recommendations among GRAPPA members was assessed with an online questionnaire. RESULTS: Treatment recommendations were developed for peripheral arthritis, axial disease, psoriasis, nail disease, dactylitis and enthesitis in the setting of PsA. In rotal, 19 recommendations were drafted, and over 80% agreement was obtained on 16 of them. In addition, a grid that factors disease severity into each of the different disease manifestations was developed to help the clinician with treatment decisions for the individual patient from an evidenced-based perspective. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment recommendations for the cardinal physical manifestations of PsA were developed based on a literature review and consensus between rheumatologists and dermatologists. In addition, a grid was established to assist in therapeutic reasoning and decision making for individual patients. It is anticipated that periodic updates will take place using this framework as new data become available.

BACKGROUND: We assessed mirror visual feedback (MVF) to test the hypothesis that incongruence between motor output and sensory input produces complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) (type 1) pain. METHODS: Eight subjects (disease duration > or =3 weeks to < or =3 yr) were studied over 6 weeks with assessments including two controls (no device and viewing a non-reflective surface) and the intervention (MVF). Pain severity and vasomotor changes were recorded. RESULTS: The control stages had no analgesic effect. MVF in early CRPS (< or =8 weeks) had an immediate analgesic effect and in intermediate disease (< or =1 yr) led to a reduction in stiffness. At 6 weeks, normalization of function and thermal differences had occurred (early and intermediate disease). No change was found in chronic CRPS. CONCLUSIONS: In early CRPS (type 1), visual input from a moving, unaffected limb re-establishes the pain-free relationship between sensory feedback and motor execution. Trophic changes and a less plastic neural pathway preclude this in chronic disease.

Psoriasis is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disease which typically follows a relapsing and remitting course, and is associated with joint disease in approximately 25% of patients.1 The significant reduction in quality of life and the psychosocial disability suffered by patients underline the need for prompt, effective treatment, and long-term disease control (reviewed2, 3). Localized, limited disease can usually be managed satisfactorily with topical agents. Those with moderate to severe disease often require systemic treatment. Phototherapy and traditional 'standard' systemic therapies, while often effective, can be associated with long-term toxicity; some are expensive, and some patients have treatment-resistant disease.4 Also, phototherapy is not available to many due to geographical, logistical or other constraints. Patients themselves demonstrate high levels of dissatisfaction with standard approaches to treatment.5, 6 Biologic therapies for psoriasis utilize molecules designed to block specific molecular steps important in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and now comprise a number of well-established, licensed, treatment options for patients with severe disease. Since 2005, when the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD) first published guidance on the use of biologic therapies in psoriasis,7 much has changed. There is a substantial body of new evidence pertinent to the clinical use of these treatments, the U.K. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has approved the use of a number of biologic therapies in severe chronic plaque psoriasis and the BAD Biologic Interventions Register (BADBIR) has been successfully launched. Despite these developments, use of biologic therapy in clinical practice remains limited in the U.K., with a shortfall in funding cited as a significant obstacle to prescribing in approximately 40% of units recently surveyed.8 These guidelines have been revised and updated in accordance with a predetermined scope. This is based on the original scope used in 2005, and extended to include additional areas of practice. Recommendations in this guideline supersede those in the 2005 guideline. The overall objective of these guidelines is to provide up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations on use of biologic therapies (infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab) in adults and children with all types of psoriasis and, where relevant, psoriatic arthritis, for clinical staff involved in the care of patients treated with biologic therapies. Efalizumab remains in the scope of the guideline in relation to safety only, given that the European Medicines Agency has withdrawn the marketing authorization of this drug because of concerns over the development of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). This guidance does not cover agents licensed outside the U.K. (alefacept) or use of biologic therapies for indications other than psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. The guideline working group represents all relevant stakeholders including dermatologists, nurses, rheumatologists and patients. Draft guidance was made available for consultation and review by patients, the BAD membership and the British Dermatological Nursing Group (BDNG). Advice relating to tuberculosis was reviewed and approved by the British Thoracic Society. The guideline has been developed using the BAD's recommended methodology9 and with reference to the AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation) instrument.10 Recommendations were developed for implementation in the National Health Service using a process of considered judgment based on the evidence and an awareness of the European product licence of the various treatments. Cochrane, EMBASE and Medline databases were searched between 1990 and June 2009 for clinical trials involving adalimumab, efalizumab, etanercept, infliximab and ustekinumab using an agreed protocol. Two reviewers screened all titles and abstracts independently, and full papers of relevant material were obtained. In relation to efficacy, only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of high quality (1+ or more; see Appendix 1) were included for chronic plaque psoriasis, whereas in other clinical phenotypes, given the paucity of published data, all data were included. Data from each paper were extracted by two members of the guideline group using standardized literature evaluation forms in order to create evidence tables. Evidence on safety was extracted from literature on use of biologic agents for any indication in view of the relatively limited data specifically relating to use in psoriasis. The methodological limitations of the safety analysis are detailed in section 15. The guideline was peer reviewed by the Clinical Standards Unit of the BAD (made up of the Therapy & Guidelines and Audit & Clinical Standards Subcommittees) prior to publication. These guidelines have been prepared on behalf of the BAD and reflect the best data available at the time the report was prepared. Caution should be exercised in interpreting the data; the results of future studies may require alteration of the conclusions or recommendations in this report. It may be necessary or even desirable to depart from the guidelines in the interests of specific patients and special circumstances. Just as adherence to guidelines may not constitute defence against a claim of negligence, so deviation from them should not necessarily be deemed negligent. This field of psoriasis biologic therapeutics is in a rapid phase of development, and revision of the scope and content of the guidelines will therefore occur on an annual basis. Where necessary, the guideline will be updated via the BAD website, and a fully revised version is planned for 2012. Most patients with moderate to severe disease achieve satisfactory disease control (i.e. significant or complete clearing of disease) in the short term with at least one of the systemic agents currently available.4 Long-term disease control frequently requires some form of continuous therapy and consequent, predictable risks of toxicity. At present, the risks and benefits of biologic therapies relative to standard systemic therapy are largely unknown. Widespread use of these agents in uncomplicated moderate to severe psoriasis is inappropriate and is not supported by the licensed indications for these drugs. Eligibility criteria should encompass both objective measures of disease severity and the impact the disease has on quality of life. All existing disease severity assessment tools are imperfect11-13 and most require some training to complete. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) is a measure of disease severity in chronic plaque psoriasis12 and has been chosen for the purposes of this guideline as it has been widely used in clinical trials including those investigating biologic therapies, and has also been adopted by NICE. A PASI score of ≥ 10 (range 0–72) has been shown to correlate with a number of indicators commonly associated with severe disease such as need for hospital admission or use of systemic therapy,14 and reflects the minimal level of disease severity required for patient inclusion in most of the clinical trials of biologic therapies to date. Where the PASI is not applicable (e.g. pustular psoriasis), body surface area (BSA) affected should be used, with severe disease defined as > 10% BSA affected.14 The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) is a validated tool for the measurement of quality of life across all skin diseases, including psoriasis, and has been used in both trial and clinical practice settings.13, 15 A score of > 10 (range 0–30) has been shown to correlate with at least 'a very large effect' on an individual's quality of life.12, 14, 16 When using the PASI and DLQI to determine whether or not a patient should be considered for biologic therapy, clinicians should take into account the applicability of these measures to each individual patient. There are circumstances where the use of these tools fails to give a sufficiently accurate assessment of the clinical situation. With respect to the PASI, this is especially pertinent in patients with localized disease that involves special 'high-impact' sites (genitalia, hands, feet, head and neck) where highly significant functional and/or psychosocial morbidity may exist with a PASI < 10. The DLQI may be a poor indicator of emotional disabilities resulting from psoriasis and the validity of the DLQI (and of other quality of life measures) may also be undermined due to linguistic or other communication difficulties.13 Patients with psoriasis may be considered eligible to receive treatment with any of the licensed biologic interventions when they fulfil the eligibility criteria set out below. However, the decision to proceed with treatment must be made in collaboration with the patient and include a careful assessment of the associated risks and benefits17 Eligibility criteria To be considered eligible for treatment, patients must have severe disease as defined in (a) and fulfil one of the clinical categories outlined in (b): (a) Severe disease defined as a PASI score of 10 or more (or a BSA of 10% or greater where PASI is not applicable) and a DLQI > 10. In exceptional circumstances (for example, disease affecting high-impact sites with associated significant functional or psychological morbidity such as acral psoriasis), patients with severe disease may fall outside this definition but should be considered for treatment (Strength of recommendation D; level of evidence 3) AND (b) Fulfil at least one of the following clinical categories (Strength of recommendation D; level of evidence 3, and formal consensus) where phototherapya and alternative standard systemic therapyb are contraindicated or cannot be used due to the development of, or risk of developing, clinically important treatment-related toxicity. are intolerant to standard systemic therapy are unresponsive to standard systemic therapyb have significant, coexistent, unrelated comorbidity which precludes use of systemic agents such as ciclosporin or methotrexate have severe, unstable, life-threatening disease Eligibility criteria for patients with skin and joint disease patients with active psoriatic arthritis or skin disease that fulfils defined British Society for Rheumatology (BSR)18 or BAD guideline criteria, respectively patients with severe skin psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis who have failed or cannot use methotrexate may need to be considered for biologic treatment given the potential benefit of such treatment on both components of psoriatic disease aPhototherapy may be inappropriate in patients (i) who have exceeded safe exposure limits (150–200 treatments for PUVA, 350 treatments for narrowband UVB19, 20), (ii) who are nonresponsive or relapse rapidly, (iii) who have a history of skin cancer or repeated episodes of severe sunburn, (iv) who are intolerant of UV exposure, especially if skin phototype I (sun-sensitive), or (v) for logistical reasons bStandard systemic therapy includes ciclosporin (2·5 mg kg−1 daily; up to 5 mg kg−1 daily), and in men, and women not at risk of pregnancy, methotrexate [single dose (oral, subcutaneous, intramuscular) of 15 mg weekly; max 25 mg weekly] and acitretin (25–50 mg daily) An adequate response to treatment is defined as either (i) a 50% or greater reduction in baseline PASI (PASI 50 response) (or % BSA where the PASI is not applicable) and a 5-point or greater improvement in DLQI4, 21-23or (ii) a 75% reduction in PASI score compared with baseline (PASI 75 response). Initial response to therapy should be assessed at time points appropriate for the drug in question (Table 1). For patients on tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonist treatment with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis, treatment may be continued if there has been a sufficient response in at least one of these components (see BSR guidelines18 for definition of disease response in psoriatic arthritis). TNF is a proinflammatory cytokine produced by a wide variety of cell types including keratinocytes. It plays a central role in the pathogenesis of psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and a number of other disease states. TNF is released from cells as a soluble cytokine (sTNF) following cleavage from its cell surface-bound precursor (transmembrane TNF, tmTNF). Both sTNF and tmTNF are biologically active, and bind to either of two distinct receptors: TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1, p55) and TNF receptor 2 (TNFR2, p75). This leads to NF-κB activation (which promotes inflammation) and/or cell apoptosis. In addition, tmTNF can itself act as a ligand (via a process of reverse signalling) to induce cell activation, cytokine suppression or apoptosis of the tmTNF-bearing cell. Soluble forms of the TNF receptors also exist and, by binding and neutralizing sTNF, may act as natural TNF antagonists. There are currently two approved groups of biologic agents that target TNF: anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies (adalimumab and infliximab), and sTNF receptors (etanercept). Infliximab is a chimeric human–murine monoclonal antibody (∼ 25% mouse-derived protein) whereas adalimumab is fully human. Etanercept is a genetically engineered fusion protein composed of a dimer of the extracellular portions of human TNFR2 (p75) fused to the Fc domain of human IgG1. All three agents specifically bind both soluble and transmembrane forms of TNF and act by (i) blocking TNFR-mediated mechanisms and (ii) inducing tmTNF (reverse-signalling) events. Etanercept also binds members of the lymphotoxin family [LTα3 (also known as TNF-β) and LTα2β1] although the biological significance of this is unclear. Aside from the latter, there are important differences between the three agents with respect to pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and structure-based mechanisms of action (only some of which are completely understood).24 It is likely that these differences, in the context of the highly complex biology of TNF, account for observed differences in the efficacy and adverse events profile of TNF antagonists. Lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) is a cell surface protein that binds to intracellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) 1–3 and plays a key role in T-lymphocyte recirculation, trafficking to sites of inflammation, antigen presentation by dendritic cells and other activated cells including keratinocytes, and T-cell costimulation. Efalizumab is a recombinant humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the CD11a subunit of LFA-1, which by interfering with LFA-1/ICAM binding inhibits several key steps important in the pathogenesis of psoriasis including T-cell migration into the skin and T-cell activation. More recently, in vivo data have shown that efalizumab induces a state of reversible T-cell 'hyporesponsiveness' including downregulation of a number of T-cell surface molecules unrelated to LFA-1 both in the circulation and in psoriatic plaques.25, 26 Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 are heterodimeric cytokines secreted by activated antigen-presenting cells, and share a common protein subunit, p40. Of relevance to psoriasis, IL-12 activates CD4 and natural killer cells to induce expression of type 1 cytokines (TNF and interferon-γ) while IL-23 stimulates survival and proliferation of a subset of T cells that produce IL-17 (Th17 cells). Recent immunological27 and genetic studies indicate a central role for IL-23 in the pathogenesis of psoriasis.28Ustekinumab is a fully human IgG1κ monoclonal antibody which acts as an IL inhibitor by binding with high affinity and specificity to the p40 protein subunit. It thus prevents IL-12 and IL-23 from binding to their IL-12Rβ1 receptor protein expressed on the surface of immune cells. Three large RCTs demonstrate that etanercept is effective in chronic plaque psoriasis.29-31 Onset of action is slower than that seen with the monoclonal antibodies, with clinically significant improvement in disease severity scores evident between 4 and 8 weeks after initiation of treatment.30 Response is dose related, with 34% (25 mg biweekly) and 48% (50 mg biweekly) of patients achieving PASI 75 by 12 weeks (Table 2). Continuing therapy up to 6 months improves response rates further (43% and 57% for 25 mg biweekly and 50 mg biweekly, respectively).29, 30, 32 While there are no RCT data establishing efficacy beyond 6 months, data from a 2-year, open-label etanercept 50 mg biweekly extension study32 (following the phase III study reported by Tyring et al.31) suggest that efficacy is maintained for up to 1 year, with approximately 75% of patients maintaining their PASI 75 response over the ensuing year. Overall, continuous therapy provides better disease control and higher levels of patient satisfaction compared with interrupted therapy. When treatment is stopped, disease relapses slowly: median time to disease relapse as defined by loss of PASI 50 in those who PASI 75 after weeks of continuous etanercept 25 or 50 mg biweekly, was and with no evidence of disease PASI scores were with the of patients achieving efficacy after 12 further weeks (i.e. and of PASI 75 this level of efficacy on Aside from objective measures of disease improvement studies also report associated clinically in quality of life reduction in and and of patients in analysis of two of these RCTs that response rates in those over were the as those although in the group were The 25 mg and 50 mg are given that their are that the number of patients achieving PASI 75 at 12 weeks following etanercept 50 mg an RCT compared with was with that seen in other RCTs investigating etanercept 25 mg biweekly and that no significant differences were observed in PASI or DLQI in a of patients open-label etanercept 25 mg biweekly and etanercept 50 mg In the RCTs the of adverse events or adverse events in patients etanercept was no greater than in the control patients, with the of in each treatment RCT has shown efficacy of etanercept 25 mg compared with acitretin mg kg−1 at weeks (see the role of TNF in levels of TNF in patients, and the used for etanercept, response rates may occur in patients, with This is in by published RCT and data cited in the study by et The of etanercept and methotrexate has been shown to be more effective in arthritis than either with no significant additional toxicity. data suggest that the of methotrexate may also etanercept efficacy in psoriasis. A RCT the efficacy and safety of etanercept (25 mg biweekly) in patients on and reported of patients or at weeks on therapy, as compared with those in methotrexate was A reported both efficacy with the of methotrexate in patients on etanercept and loss of efficacy on of methotrexate from patients on Data from a RCT reported that the of etanercept 25 mg with acitretin mg kg−1 is as effective as etanercept 25 mg and that both these interventions are more effective that acitretin These data suggest that in the short term at the may additional efficacy as there is no additional associated toxicity. The patient in the cited RCTs may not be of patients likely to be treated in clinical practice as to the studies required patients only to be considered or have or systemic therapy. However, objective disease severity criteria were the as those currently recommended by the BAD and and PASI scores on to studies were higher from 16 to studies of practice report response rates in patients who have failed systemic therapies, all of which that data from the RCTs can be to clinical 50 There is a of long-term RCT data beyond 6 months, and only limited data on the two published studies one is and both report following one of treatment RCT data indicate that 50 mg biweekly is more effective than 25 mg biweekly, but there are no trial data whether the dose to 50 mg biweekly in patients who to achieve or adequate on 25 mg biweekly results in disease This is especially pertinent given guidance which currently limits treatment to the 25 mg biweekly dose (see Etanercept is licensed for use in moderate to severe psoriasis at either 50 or 25 mg biweekly for the first months, and 25 mg biweekly for up to therapy beyond weeks may be appropriate for some patients has approved use of etanercept in severe plaque psoriasis to defined disease at the 25 mg biweekly dose only, and not the 50 mg dose effective, with therapy to be continued only in those patients achieving disease response at months (Table 1). Etanercept is recommended for the treatment of patients with severe psoriasis who fulfil the disease severity criteria to section (Strength of recommendation level of evidence Etanercept therapy may be at either 50 or 25 mg and disease response assessed at months (Strength of recommendation level of evidence The of which dose to use will on clinical disease body and, in the U.K., the dose that will be (Strength of recommendation level of evidence Patients on etanercept 25 mg may to to etanercept 50 mg as these two are in of efficacy (Strength of recommendation level of evidence In patients who treatment may be continued to clinical although long-term data on efficacy are limited to 2 (Strength of recommendation level of evidence may be risk of disease although there may be a response on therapy (Strength of recommendation level of evidence may be recommended in clinical where it is required for associated or to efficacy (Strength of recommendation level of evidence Three large indicate that infliximab therapy is highly effective in chronic plaque psoriasis (Table Onset of action is with evidence of significant improvement the first 2 weeks of treatment and benefit by 10 when of patients achieve PASI 75 (Table (and in DLQI of This response is largely maintained over time with and achieving PASI 75 at 6 and 12 months, respectively (Table 2). of efficacy with development of antibodies to which in of patients continuous therapy and 5 mg following a standard 2 and 6 continuous therapy at 5 mg kg−1 8 weeks to relapse in the by loss of PASI was as and in the of although data were not An that 50% patients relapse of PASI by There are no published trial data beyond 1 year. study assessed disease using the Psoriasis Severity Index to a a improvement in from baseline was observed at 10 with a of improvement reported at This was maintained of patients with complete of disease the target continued to between weeks and 50 and There are no RCT data on use of methotrexate in with infliximab in psoriasis. In both and psoriatic arthritis, with methotrexate is a licensed and response rates and are at least in these disease levels of infliximab have been reported with methotrexate which may in of mg also the of antibodies to The patient in the cited RCTs may not be of patients likely to be treated in clinical practice. The PASI at baseline was ≥ 10 in all the studies However, of systemic therapy was not an in that most studies required patients to be for systemic therapy and/or failed A of patients in the study by et indicate that baseline PASI > and the of treatments two or more systemic therapies, or biologic no on treatment The of the study investigating continuous infliximab therapy is in that study at patients randomized to receive therapy receive infliximab at PASI 75 was not and in both were reported as Infliximab is licensed for use mg kg−1 8 in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. has approved use of infliximab in patients with severe (PASI ≥ DLQI ≥ with treatment beyond 10 weeks recommended only in those who achieve response Infliximab is recommended for the treatment of patients with severe psoriasis who fulfil the disease severity criteria to section (Strength of recommendation level of evidence Infliximab therapy should be at a dose of 5 mg kg−1 at weeks 2 and 6 and disease response assessed at months (Strength of recommendation level of evidence In patients who mg should be given at to disease control although long-term data are available only up to 1 (Strength of recommendation level of evidence therapy should be given the associated risk of and disease control (Strength of recommendation level of evidence may be recommended in clinical where it is required for associated to efficacy or to the development of antibodies to infliximab (Strength of recommendation D; level of evidence 3) Three large RCTs demonstrate that adalimumab is a highly effective treatment for chronic plaque psoriasis (Table Onset of action is with significant in disease severity evident 2 weeks of treatment and disease response seen between weeks 12 and Response is dose with of patients achieving PASI 75 at 12 with adalimumab mg other (i.e. the licensed dose for psoriasis), and achieving PASI 75 with adalimumab mg relevant in quality of life indicators are also In one a subset of patients who failed to achieve PASI 50 following at least weeks of adalimumab other was to the dose for the of the study 40% of this PASI 50 that dose may further data are available up to 1 year, with no evidence of significant loss of response over time in those patients who and are continued on of response on treatment was also in the phase of the study reported by et those who maintained PASI 75 by were to receive either or a further weeks of adalimumab While time to relapse was not of patients PASI 50 response relative to baseline with a of a in PASI score relative to compared with relapse in those on adalimumab by of this patients who

STUDY DESIGN: A literature review was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To examine the outcome of behavioral (BT) and cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT), collectively referred to as BT-CBT, for chronic pain, to identify the predictors of treatment outcome, and to investigate the change processes associated with these treatments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Numerous controlled clinical trials of BT-CBT for chronic pain, alone or more commonly in multidisciplinary treatment contexts, suggest that these treatments are effective. However, further study is needed to examine which outcome variables change, when, for whom, and how. METHODS: Published literature was gathered from Medline, PsychLit, and searches of relevant journals. RESULTS: Overall, BT-CBT for chronic pain reduces patients' pain, distress, and pain behavior, and improves their daily functioning. Differences across studies in sample characteristics, treatment features, and assessment methods seem to produce varied treatment results. Also, some patients benefit more than others. Highly distressed patients who see their pain as an uncontrollable and highly negative life event derive less benefit than other patients. Decreased negative emotional responses to pain, decreased perceptions of disability, and increased orientation toward self-management during the course of treatment predict favorable treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Current BT-CBT helps many patients with chronic pain. Continuing clinical research should improve the matching of treatments with patient characteristics and refine the focus of treatments on behavior changes most associated with positive outcome. Further study of fear, attention, readiness to adopt self-management strategies, acceptance of pain, and new combinations of interdisciplinary treatments may lead to improved interventions.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of a cannabis-based medicine (CBM) in the treatment of pain due to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We compared a CBM (Sativex) with placebo in a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study in 58 patients over 5 weeks of treatment. The CBM was administered by oromucosal spray in the evening and assessments were made the following morning. Efficacy outcomes assessed were pain on movement, pain at rest, morning stiffness and sleep quality measured by a numerical rating scale, the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and the DAS28 measure of disease activity. RESULTS: Seventy-five patients were screened and 58 met the eligibility criteria. Thirty-one were randomized to the CBM and 27 to placebo. Mean (S.D.) daily dose achieved in the final treatment week was 5.4 (0.84) actuations for the CBM and 5.3 (1.18) for placebo. In comparison with placebo, the CBM produced statistically significant improvements in pain on movement, pain at rest, quality of sleep, DAS28 and the SF-MPQ pain at present component. There was no effect on morning stiffness but baseline scores were low. The large majority of adverse effects were mild or moderate, and there were no adverse effect-related withdrawals or serious adverse effects in the active treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: In the first ever controlled trial of a CBM in RA, a significant analgesic effect was observed and disease activity was significantly suppressed following Sativex treatment. Whilst the differences are small and variable across the population, they represent benefits of clinical relevance and show the need for more detailed investigation in this indication.

Adolescents with chronic pain also report severe disability and emotional distress. A clinical sample of 80 adolescents and accompanying parents were investigated to first measure the extent of distress, and second to investigate the relationships between adolescent distress, parental distress and adolescent coping. Measures of pain intensity, anxiety, depression, disability and coping were obtained from adolescents. Parents completed measures including their own anxiety, depression and parenting stress. Overall, adolescents reported high levels of disability, depression and anxiety, and parents reported high levels of depression, anxiety and parenting stress. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the best predictors of adolescent emotional distress were the extent to which the adolescents catastrophize and seek social support to cope with the pain. There were no clear predictors of parental anxiety or depression but the specific pattern of parenting stress was best predicted by the younger age of the adolescent, the greater the chronicity of the problem, and the greater the extent of adolescent depression. These findings suggest that emotional coping is a critical variable in the distress associated with adolescent chronic pain. It is argued that adolescent emotional coping may best be understood within a relational context of seeking emotional support.