Ethical debate: Informed consent in medical research Informed consent---a response to recent correspondence Changing the BMJ's position on informed consent would be counterproductive Informed consent---a publisher's duty Trial subjects must be fully involved in design and approval of trials Studies that do not have informed consent from participants should not be published

Doyal, Lesley; Tobias, Jeffrey; Warnock, Mary; Power, L.; Goodare, Heather

doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7136.1000

Public

Ethical debate: Informed consent in medical research Informed consent---a response to recent correspondence Changing the BMJ's position on informed consent would be counterproductive Informed consent---a publisher's duty Trial subjects must be fully involved in design and approval of trials Studies that do not have informed consent from participants should not be published

Published in BMJ • Mar 28, 1998

Authors:

Lesley Doyal

Jeffrey Tobias

Mary Warnock

Abstract

# Informed consent in medical research {#article-title-2} In the issue of 12 April 1997 the BMJ invited comment on the acceptable limits of informed consent in medical studies. In view of the large correspondence this generated, we invited the two original commentators, Len Doyal and Jeffrey Tobias,...

Subject

Informed consent

Biobank

Duty

Research Assistant

AI chat, annotations, notes & similar papers

Finding related papers...

Discussions

(0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!