Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

C. Dueck, Amylou; R. Mendoza, Tito; A. Mitchell, Sandra; B. Reeve, Bryce; M. Castro, Kathleen; J. Rogak, Lauren; M. Atkinson, Thomas; V. Bennett, Antonia; Denicoff, Andrea; M. O’Mara, Ann; Li, Yuelin; B. Clauser, Steven; Bryant, Donna; D. Bearden, James; A. Gillis, Theresa; K. Harness, Jay; D. Siegel, Robert; Β. Paul, Diane; S. Cleeland, Charles; Schrag, Deborah; A. Sloan, Jeff; P. Abernethy, Amy; Watkins Bruner, Deborah; M. Minasian, Lori; Basch, Ethan

doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2639

Public

Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

Published in JAMA Oncology • Aug 13, 2015

Authors:

Amylou C. Dueck

Tito R. Mendoza

Sandra A. Mitchell

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: To integrate the patient perspective into adverse event reporting, the National Cancer Institute developed a patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). OBJECTIVE: To assess the construct validity, test-retest reliability, and resp...

Subject

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

Medicine

Adverse effect

Research Assistant

AI chat, annotations, notes & similar papers

Finding related papers...

Discussions

(0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!