Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate <scp>F</scp>ree‐<scp>A</scp>ir <scp>CO</scp><sub>2</sub><scp> E</scp>nrichment studies

Zaehle, Sönke; E. Medlyn, Belinda; G. De Kauwe, Martin; P. Walker, Anthony; C. Dietze, Michael; Hickler, Thomas; Luo, Yiqi; Wang, Ying‐Ping; El Masri, Bassil; Thornton, Peter; K. Jain, Atul; Wang, Shusen; Wårlind, David; Weng, Ensheng; J. Parton, William; M. Iversen, Colleen; Gallet‐Budynek, Anne; R. McCarthy, Heather; C. Finzi, Adrien; J. Hanson, Paul; Colin Prentice, I.; Oren, Ram; J. Norby, Richard

doi:10.1111/nph.12697

Public

Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free‐Air CO2 Enrichment studies

Published in New Phytologist • Jan 28, 2014

Authors:

Sönke Zaehle

Belinda E. Medlyn

Martin G. De Kauwe

Abstract

We analysed the responses of 11 ecosystem models to elevated atmospheric [CO2 ] (eCO2 ) at two temperate forest ecosystems (Duke and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Free-Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) experiments) to test alternative representations of carbon (C)-nitrogen (N) cycle processes. We dec...

Subject

Ecosystem

Temperate climate

Carbon cycle

Research Assistant

AI chat, annotations, notes & similar papers

Finding related papers...

Discussions

(0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!