Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT)

Boers, Kim; Vijgen, Sylvia; Bijlenga, Denise; van der Post, Joris; Bekedam, D.J.; Kwee, Anneke; C. M. van der Salm, P.; G. van Pampus, Maria; E. A. Spaanderman, Marc; Boer, Karin; J. Duvekot, Johannes; Bremer, H.A.; H.M. Hasaart, Tom; M.C. Delemarre, Friso; W.M. Bloemenkamp, Kitty; A van Meir, Claudia; Willekes, Christine; J. Wijnen, Ella; Rijken, Monique; le Cessie, Saskia; J.M.E. Roumen, Frans; Thornton, Jim; M. M. van Lith, J.; W. Mol, Ben; A. Scherjon, Sicco; behalf of the DIGITAT study group, on

doi:10.1136/bmj.c7087

Public

Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT)

Published in BMJ • Dec 21, 2010

Authors:

Kim Boers

Sylvia Vijgen

Denise Bijlenga

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of induction of labour with a policy of expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction near term. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised equivalence trial (the Disproportionate Intrauterine Growth Intervention Trial At Term (DIGITAT)). SETTING: Eight academic and 4...

Subject

Medicine

Caesarean section

Obstetrics

Research Assistant

AI chat, annotations, notes & similar papers

Finding related papers...

Discussions

(0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!