Anatomic Versus Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease

Lance Gould, K.; P. Johnson, Nils; M. Bateman, Timothy; Beanlands, Rob; M. Bengel, Frank; Bober, Robert; G. Camici, Paolo; D. Cerqueira, Manuel; J.W. Chow, Benjamin; F. Di Carli, Marcelo; Dorbala, Sharmila; Gewirtz, Henry; J. Gropler, Robert; A. Kaufmann, Philipp; Knaapen, Paul; Knuuti, Juhani; E. Merhige, Michael; Rentrop, K.Peter; D. Ruddy, Terrence; R. Schelbert, Heinrich; H. Schindler, Thomas; Schwaiger, Markus; Sdringola, Stefano; Vitarello, John; A. Williams, Kim; Gordon, Donald; Dilsizian, Vasken; Narula, Jagat

doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.076

Public

Anatomic Versus Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease

Published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology • Aug 28, 2013

Authors:

K. Lance Gould

Nils P. Johnson

Timothy M. Bateman

Abstract

Angiographic severity of coronary artery stenosis has historically been the primary guide to revascularization or medical management of coronary artery disease. However, physiologic severity defined by coronary pressure and/or flow has resurged into clinical prominence as a potential, fundamental ch...

Subject

Medicine

Coronary artery disease

Fractional flow reserve

Finding related papers...

Discussions

(0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!