Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation—a benchmark of metagenomics software

Sczyrba, Alexander; Hofmann, Peter; Belmann, Peter; Koslicki, David; Janssen, Stefan; Dröge, Johannes; Gregor, Ivan; Majda, Stephan; Fiedler, Jessika; Dahms, Eik; Bremges, Andreas; Fritz, Adrian; Garrido‐Oter, Rubén; Sparholt Jørgensen, Tue; Shapiro, Nicole; D. Blood, Philip; Gurevich, Alexey; Bai, Yang; Turaev, Dmitrij; Z. DeMaere, Matthew; Chikhi, Rayan; Nagarajan, Niranjan; Quince, Christopher; Meyer, Fernando; Balvočiūtė, Monika; Hestbjerg Hansen, Lars; J. Sørensen, Søren; Kuan Hui Chia, Burton; Denis, Bertrand; Froula, Jeff; Wang, Zhong; W. Egan, Robert; Kang, Dongwan; Cook, Jeffrey; Deltel, Charles; Beckstette, Michael; Lemaitre, Claire; Peterlongo, Pierre; Rizk, Guillaume; Lavenier, Dominique; Wu, Yu‐Wei; W. Singer, Steven; Jain, Chirag; Strous, Marc; Klingenberg, Heiner; Meinicke, Peter; D. Barton, Michael; Lingner, Thomas; Lin, Hsin-Hung; Liao, Yu-Chieh; Gueiros Z. Silva, Genivaldo; Cuevas, Daniel; A. Edwards, Robert; Saha, Surya; C. Piro, Vitor; Y. Renard, Bernhard; Pop, Mihai; Klenk, Hans‐Peter; Göker, Markus; C. Kyrpides, Nikos; Woyke, Tanja; A. Vorholt, Julia; Schulze‐Lefert, Paul; M. Rubin, Edward; E. Darling, Aaron; Rattei, Thomas; C. McHardy, Alice

doi:10.1038/nmeth.4458

Public

Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation—a benchmark of metagenomics software

Published in Nature Methods • Oct 2, 2017

Authors:

Alexander Sczyrba

Peter Hofmann

Peter Belmann

Abstract

The Critical Assessment of Metagenome Interpretation (CAMI) community initiative presents results from its first challenge, a rigorous benchmarking of software for metagenome assembly, binning and taxonomic profiling. Methods for assembly, taxonomic profiling and binning are key to interpreting meta...

Subject

Metagenomics

Computational biology

Benchmark (surveying)

Research Assistant

AI chat, annotations, notes & similar papers

Finding related papers...

Discussions

(0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!