Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study.

C, Marquez; AM, Johnson; S, Jassemi; J, Park; JE, Moore; C, Blaine; G, Bourdon; M, Chignell; ME, Ellen; J, Fortin; ID, Graham; A, Hayes; J, Hamid; B, Hemmelgarn; M, Hillmer; B, Holmes; J, Holroyd-Leduc; L, Hubert; B, Hutton; M, Kastner; JN, Lavis; K, Michell; D, Moher; M, Ouimet; L, Perrier; A, Proctor; T, Noseworthy; V, Schuckel; S, Stayberg; M, Tonelli; AC, Tricco; SE, Straus

doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0779-9

Public

Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study.

Shared by NobleBlocks on Jun 22, 2018 • 12:00 AM UTC

Authors:

Marquez C

Johnson AM

Jassemi S

Abstract

Background Systematic reviews are infrequently used by health care managers (HCMs) and policy-makers (PMs) in decision-making. HCMs and PMs co-developed and tested novel systematic review of effects formats to increase their use.Methods A three-phased approach was used to evaluate the determinants t...

Subject

Decision Making

Systematic Reviews

Usability

Research Assistant

AI chat, annotations, notes & similar papers

Finding related papers...

Discussions

(0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!