Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

A. Grobman, William; Murguia Rice, Madeline; M. Reddy, Uma; Tita, Alan; M. Silver, Robert; Mallett, Gail; Hill, Kim; Thom, Elizabeth; Y. El‐Sayed, Yasser; Perez‐Delboy, Annette; J. Rouse, Dwight; R. Saade, George; Boggess, Kim; P. Chauhan, Suneet; D. Iams, Jay; K. Chien, Edward; M. Casey, Brian; S. Gibbs, Ronald; K. Srinivas, Sindhu; K. Swamy, Geeta; N. Simhan, Hyagriv; A. Macones, George

doi:10.1056/nejmoa1800566

Public

Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women

Published in New England Journal of Medicine • Aug 8, 2018

Authors:

William A. Grobman

Madeline Murguia Rice

Uma M. Reddy

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The perinatal and maternal consequences of induction of labor at 39 weeks among low-risk nulliparous women are uncertain. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned low-risk nulliparous women who were at 38 weeks 0 days to 38 weeks 6 days of gestation to labor induction at ...

Subject

Obstetrics

Medicine

Expectant management

Research Assistant

AI chat, annotations, notes & similar papers

Finding related papers...

Discussions

(0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!