Predatory journals: no definition, no defence

Grudniewicz, Agnes; Moher, David; D. Cobey, Kelly; L. Bryson, Gregory; Cukier, Samantha; Allen, Kristiann; L. Ardern, Clare; Balcom, Lesley; Barros, Tiago; Berger, Monica; Buitrago, Jairo; Cugusi, Lucia; Donaldson, Michael; Egger, Matthias; D. Graham, Ian; Hodgkinson, Matt; M. Khan, Karim; Mabizela, Mahlubi; Manca, Andrea; Milzow, Katrin; Mouton, Johann; Muchenje, Marvelous; Olijhoek, Tom; K. Ommaya, A.; Patwardhan, Bhushan; C. Poff, Deborah; Proulx, Laurie; Rodger, Marc; Severin, Anna; Strinzel, Michaela; Sylos Labini, Mauro; Tamblyn, Robyn; van Niekerk, Marthie; M. Wicherts, Jelte; M. Lalu, Manoj

doi:10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y

Public

Predatory journals: no definition, no defence

Published in Nature • Dec 11, 2019

Authors:

Agnes Grudniewicz

David Moher

Kelly D. Cobey

Abstract

Leading scholars and publishers from ten countries have agreed a definition of predatory publishing that can protect scholarship. It took 12 hours of discussion, 18 questions and 3 rounds to reach. Leading scholars and publishers from ten countries have agreed a definition of predatory publishing th...

Subject

Scholarship

Publishing

Political science

Research Assistant

AI chat, annotations, notes & similar papers

Finding related papers...

Discussions

(0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!