International Natural Procreative Technology Evaluation and Surveillance of Treatment for Subfertility (iNEST): enrollment and methods

B. Stanford, Joseph; A. Parnell, T.; Kantor, Kristi; R. Reeder, Matthew; Najmabadi, Shahpar; A. Johnson, Karen; Musso, Iris; Hartman, Hanna; Huiwen Tham, Elizabeth; Winter, Ira; Gałczyński, Krzysztof; Carus, Anne; Sherlock, Amy; Golden Tevald, Jean; Barczentewicz, Maciej; L. Meier, Barbara; A. Carpentier, Paul; D. Poehailos, Karen; Chasuk, Robert; G. Danis, Peter; Lipscomb, Lewis

doi:10.1093/hropen/hoac033

Public

International Natural Procreative Technology Evaluation and Surveillance of Treatment for Subfertility (iNEST): enrollment and methods

Published in Human Reproduction Open • Jan 1, 2022

Authors:

Joseph B. Stanford

T. A. Parnell

Kristi Kantor

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What is the feasibility of a prospective protocol to follow subfertile couples being treated with natural procreative technology for up to 3 years at multiple clinical sites? SUMMARY ANSWER: Overall, clinical sites had missing data for about one-third of participants, the proportion ...

Subject

Assisted reproductive technology

Medicine

Live birth

Research Assistant

AI chat, annotations, notes & similar papers

Finding related papers...

Discussions

(0)

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts!